超声征象、MRI多序列与血清AFP联合在胎盘植入分级及妊娠结局中的预测效能比较

鲍天萍, 石德峰, 周伟娜, 吴向玲

湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1) : 48-54.

PDF(3150 KB)
PDF(3150 KB)
湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1) : 48-54.
临床医学

超声征象、MRI多序列与血清AFP联合在胎盘植入分级及妊娠结局中的预测效能比较

  • 鲍天萍1, 石德峰2, 周伟娜1, 吴向玲1
作者信息 +

Comparison of the predictive efficacy of ultrasound signs, MRI multi-sequences, and serum AFP in the grading of placental implantation and pregnancy outcomes

  • BAO Tianping1, SHI Defeng2, ZHOU Weina1, WU Xiangling1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:分析比较超声征象、磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)多序列与血清甲胎蛋白(alpha-fetoprotein,AFP)联合在胎盘植入分级及不良妊娠结局中的预测价值,为胎盘植入临床评估提供参考。方法:选取2021年3月—2023年1月我院收治的192例胎盘植入剖宫产分娩孕妇,依据分娩后病理结果分级:Ⅰ级(83例)、Ⅱ级(78例)、Ⅲ级(31例),并统计不良妊娠结局发生情况(术中出血≥1 500 mL和/或子宫切除)。产前均行超声检查、MRI检查及血清AFP检查,分析末次超声征象、MRI多序列、血清AFP与其联合对胎盘植入的联合预测价值。结果:192例中不良妊娠结局79例、良好妊娠结局113例。胎盘植入Ⅰ级组、Ⅱ级组、Ⅲ级组超声征象、MRI多序列征象出现比例比较差异有统计学意义,血清AFP水平比较,Ⅲ级组高于Ⅱ级组、Ⅰ级组,Ⅱ级组高于Ⅰ级组;不良妊娠结局组、良好妊娠结局组超声征象、MRI多序列征象出现比例比较差异有统计学意义;血清AFP水平比较,不良妊娠结局组高于良好妊娠结局组;ROC曲线显示,MRI多序列联合血清AFP预测胎盘植入分级、不良妊娠结局的AUC分别为0.949(95%CI:0.907~0.975)、0.939(95%CI:0.895~0.969),预测效能优于超声征象联合血清AFP。结论:MRI多序列联合血清AFP在胎盘植入分级、不良妊娠结局预测中有较高应用价值,预测效能优于超声征象联合血清AFP。

Abstract

Objective To analyze and compare the predictive value of ultrasound signs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) multi-sequences, and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the grading of placental implantation and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and to provide a reference for clinical evaluation of placental implantation. Methods A total of 192 pregnant women who underwent cesarean section for placenta implantation in our hospital from March 2021 to January 2023 were selected. According to the pathological results after delivery, they were classified into grade I (83 cases), grade II (78 cases), and grade III (31 cases). and the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes (intraoperative bleeding≥1 500 mL and/or hysterectomy) was counted. All patients underwent ultrasound, MRI, and serum AFP examinations before delivery. The combined predictive value of the last ultrasound sign, MRI multi-sequence, serum AFP, and their combination for placental implantation were analyzed. Results Of the 192 cases, 79 had adverse pregnancy outcomes and 113 had good pregnancy outcomes. The proportion of ultrasound signs and MRI multiple sequence signs of placenta implantation in grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ groups had statistical significance. The level of serum AFP in grade Ⅲ group was higher than that in grade Ⅱ and Ⅰ groups, and grade Ⅱ group was higher than that in grade Ⅰ group. There were significant differences in the proportion of ultrasound signs and MRI multiple sequence signs between the adverse pregnancy outcome group and the good pregnancy outcome group. Comparison of serum AFP levels was higher in the poor pregnancy outcome group than in the good pregnancy outcome group. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the AUC of MRI multi-sequence combined with serum AFP for predicting placental implantation grading and adverse pregnancy outcomes were 0.949 (95%CI: 0.907-0.975) and 0.939 (95%CI: 0.895-0.969), respectively, with better predictive performance than ultrasound signs combined with serum AFP. Conclusion The combination of MRI multi-sequence and serum AFP has high application value in the grading of placental implantation and the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and its predictive efficacy is superior to that of ultrasound signs combined with serum AFP.

关键词

胎盘植入 / 超声 / 磁共振成像 / 甲胎蛋白 / 妊娠结局 / 受试者工作特征曲线

Key words

placental implantation / ultrasound / magnetic resonance imaging / alpha-fetoprotein / pregnancy outcome / receiver operating characteristic curve

引用本文

导出引用
鲍天萍, 石德峰, 周伟娜, 吴向玲. 超声征象、MRI多序列与血清AFP联合在胎盘植入分级及妊娠结局中的预测效能比较[J]. 湖南师范大学学报医学版. 2025, 22(1): 48-54
BAO Tianping, SHI Defeng, ZHOU Weina, WU Xiangling. Comparison of the predictive efficacy of ultrasound signs, MRI multi-sequences, and serum AFP in the grading of placental implantation and pregnancy outcomes[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science). 2025, 22(1): 48-54
中图分类号: R714   

参考文献

[1] FEDUNIW S, WARZECHA D, SZYMUSIK I, et al.Epidemiology, prevention and management of early postpartum hemorrhage-a systematic review[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2020, 91(1): 38-44.
[2] 钟伟珍, 严敏莉, 唐坚. 胎盘植入高危因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2021, 29(8): 1601-1605.
[3] PARK HS, CHO HS.Management of massive hemorrhage in pregnant women with placenta previa[J]. Anesth Pain Med(Seoul), 2020, 15(4): 409-416.
[4] YE CH, LING L, LI S, et al.Comparisons of the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasonic sign-score method and MRI for PA, PI and PP in high-risk gravid women: a retrospective study[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2023, 11(2): 81.
[5] MELAMED N, OKUN N, HUANG T, et al.Maternal First-Trimester Alpha-Fetoprotein and Placenta-Mediated Pregnancy Complications[J]. Hypertension, 2023, 80(11): 2415-2424.
[6] 王倩, 李晓芸. 母血中β-hCG、AFP联合多普勒超声诊断前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的价值分析[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2022, 19(11): 1546-1548.
[7] 谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 第8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 126-129.
[8] 段思, 黄靖锐, 彭巧珍, 等. 晚孕期胎盘植入止血技术应用分级583例分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(10): 1143-1148.
[9] 樊琦玮, 黄宝梅, 赵武华, 等. MRI不同扫描序列对胎盘植入患者诊断和分级评估的价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(4): 935-937.
[10] 崔静静, 王莉, 玄英华, 等. 胎盘植入性疾病产前超声分级系统评估凶险性前置胎盘手术风险的研究[J]. 中国医刊, 2021, 56(4): 412-416.
[11] 陈练, 陈明, 裴新龙, 等. 基于MRI征象的评分模型预测侵袭性胎盘植入和不良临床结局的价值[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2021, 24(1): 32-39.
[12] HORGAN R, ABUHAMAD A.Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Prenatal Diagnosis and Management[J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2022, 49(3): 423-438.
[13] 薛晶晶, 王莉, 崔静静, 等. 宫颈受累的超声征象对胎盘植入性疾病临床分级诊断及不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(2): 135-139.
[14] DE OLIVEIRA CARNIELLO M, OLIVEIRA BRITO LG, SARIAN LO, et al. Diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum in high-risk women using ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 59(4): 428-436.
[15] 倪臣美, 李丹, 杜桂枝, 等. MRI多序列联合多征象对胎盘植入的诊断价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2023, 39(2): 259-262.
[16] 董诗洁, 胡晓欣, 王葳, 等. 基于多序列MRI与多体系影像组学模型预测子宫颈癌淋巴结转移的研究[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(6): 460-467.
[17] KOESMARSONO B, ARYANANDA RA, ARIANI G, et al.Lifesaving diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum using MRI: Report of five cases[J]. Radiol Case Rep, 2022, 17(5): 1803-1809.
[18] CONTURIE CL, LYELL DJ.Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 34(2): 90-99.
[19] BOROVKOV VA, IGITOVA MB, KORENOVSKIY YV, et al.Prognostic significance of specific proteins of pregnancy in women with a uterine scar and placenta accreta[J]. Klin Lab Diagn, 2020, 65(6): 353-357.
[20] CAI SN, WU YT, ZENG L, et al.Value of 3D ultrasound flow imaging combined with serum AFP, β-hCG, sFlt-1 and CK in the diagnosis of placenta accreta[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2022, 22(1): 556.
[21] 陆静静, 王海娜, 柴露燕. 磁共振成像联合血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素、甲胎蛋白在前置胎盘植入患者及其分型中的临床检测价值[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2020, 35(4): 758-761.
[22] 邢磊, 王凤鸽, 满冬梅. 超声联合血清CK、AFP、β-hCG水平检测预测凶险型前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的价值分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2023, 30(4): 493-496.
[23] ABOUGHALIA H, BASTAWROUS S, REVZIN MV, et al.Imaging findings in association with altered maternal alpha-fetoprotein levels during pregnancy[J]. Abdom Radiol(NY), 2020, 45(10): 3239-3257.
[24] BEREZOWSKY A, PARDO J, BEN-ZION M, et al.Second Trimester Biochemical Markers as Possible Predictors of Pathological Placentation: A Retrospective Case-Control Study[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2019, 46(3): 187-192.

基金

保定市科技计划项目“胎儿闭合性脊柱裂产前超声筛查现状及影响因素”(2241ZF062)

PDF(3150 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/