目的:探讨人工智能宫颈癌筛查系统与阴道镜在宫颈鳞状上皮内病变筛查中的临床效果。方法:我院收治的1 726例行宫颈鳞状上皮内病变筛查的女性,采用人工智能宫颈癌筛查系统与阴道镜联合筛查宫颈鳞状上皮内病变,并与病理检查结果比较,分析单独检测与联合检测的一致性、诊断价值。结果:1 726例筛检者中,活检病理结果异常5.27%(91/1 726),其中LSIL、HSIL、鳞癌分别占63.7%(58/91)、28.6%(26/91)、7.7%(7/91)。TS检测结果异常4.81%(83/1 726)(95%CI:3.62%~6.68%)。TS检测的特异度为99.8%(1 631/1 635)(95%CI:85.74%~99.99%),灵敏度为91.2%(83/91)(95%CI:84.21%~93.42%)。阴道镜检结果异常4.17%(72/1 726)(95%CI:87.39%~99.28%)。阴道镜检的特异度为99.6%(1 629/1 635)(95%CI:87.84%~99.99%),灵敏度为79.1%(72/91)(95%CI:70.27%~86.29%)。联合检测结果异常5.00%(86/1 726)(95%CI:1.27%~9.38%)。联合检测的特异度为99.9%(1 634/1 635)(95%CI: 90.23%~99.99%),灵敏度为94.5%(86/91)(95%CI:88.45%~98.75%)。Logistic多因素回归分析显示宫颈癌家族史(OR=1.805,95%CI:1.217~2.675)、生殖道HPV感染(OR=1.842,95%CI:1.263~2.681)、性伴侣生殖系统恶性肿瘤(OR=1.364,95%CI:1.096~1.874)是影响宫颈癌发生的危险因素。结论:宫颈癌家族史、生殖道HPV感染、性伴侣生殖系统恶性肿瘤是影响宫颈癌发生的危险因素,为临床预防和治疗提供了依据。采用人工智能宫颈癌筛查系统与阴道镜联合检测宫颈鳞状上皮内病变,监测的灵敏度、特异度高,与病理检测一致性好,诊断价值高,适于在临床推广应用。
Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical effects of artificial intelligence cervical cancer screening system and colposcopy in cervical lesion screening. Methods 1 726 women admitted to our hospital for cervical lesion screening were screened for cervical lesions using artificial intelligence cervical cancer screening system in combination with colposcopy, and the results were compared with those of pathological examination to analyze the consistency and diagnostic value of separate detection and combined detection. Results Among 1 726 screened patients, 5.27% (91/1 726) had abnormal biopsy pathology results, of which LSIL, HSIL, and squamous carcinoma accounted for 63.7% (58/91), 28.6% (26/91), and 7.7% (7/91), respectively. TS test results were abnormal in 4.81% (83/1 726) (95% CI: 3.62%-6.68%). The specificity of the TS test was 99.8% (1 631/1 635) (95% CI: 85.74%-99.99%) and the sensitivity was 91.2% (83/91) (95% CI: 84.21%-93.42%). Colposcopy findings were abnormal in 4.17% (72/1 726) (95% CI: 87.39%-99.28%). The specificity of colposcopy was 99.6% (1 629/1 635) (95% CI: 87.84%-99.99%) and the sensitivity was 79.1% (72/91) (95% CI: 70.27%-86.29%). The combined assay was abnormal in 5.00% (86/1 726) (95% CI: 1.27%-9.38%). The specificity of the combined test was 99.9% (1 634/1 635) (95% CI: 90.23%-99.99%) and the sensitivity was 94.5% (86/91) (95% CI: 88.45%-98.75%). Logistic multivariate regression analysis revealed that family history of cervical cancer (OR=1.805, 95%CI: 1.217-2.675), genital HPV infection (OR=1.842, 95%CI: 1.263-2.681), and reproductive system malignancy in sexual partners (OR=1.364, 95%CI: 1.096-1.874) are risk factors for the occurrence of cervical cancer. Conclusion Family history of cervical cancer, genital HPV infection, and reproductive system malignancy in sexual partners are risk factors for the occurrence of cervical cancer, providing a basis for clinical prevention and treatment. The adoption of an artificial intelligence cervical cancer screening system combined with colposcopy for detecting cervical lesions results in high sensitivity and specificity, good consistency with pathological testing, and high diagnostic value, making it suitable for clinical application and promotion.
关键词
人工智能宫颈癌筛查系统 /
阴道镜 /
宫颈鳞状上皮内病变 /
筛查
Key words
artificial intelligence cervical cancer screening system /
colposcopy /
cervical intraepithelial lesions /
screening
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Voelker R A.Cervical Cancer Screening[J]. JAMA, 2023, 330(20): 2030.
[2] 孙小霞, 王榆平, 思美丽, 等. 1990—2019年我国宫颈癌发病与死亡趋势及其年龄-时期-队列模型[J]. 中国癌症防治杂志, 2024, 16(03): 317-320.
[3] 潘凤, 王杰, 张艳莎, 等. 基于机器学习的宫颈癌致病因素分析[J]. 工业控制计算机, 2023, 36(4): 122-124.
[4] 李庆芳. 宫颈细胞学联合高危型HPV检测与宫颈组织病理学的关系分析[J]. 西藏医药, 2024, 45(03): 45-47.
[5] 倪丹, 柳蕊, 张静, 等. 高危型HPV与HPV16/18检测在宫颈癌前病变及宫颈癌筛查中的应用价值[J]. 中国卫生工程学, 2024, 23(03): 363-365.
[6] 单灵钰, 梁靓, 马明妍, 等. 宫颈液基细胞学检查联合阴道镜Reid评分在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用价值[J]. 妇儿健康导刊, 2024, 3(12): 88-91.
[7] 袁明明, 葛婷婷, 章小霞, 等. 3种不同方法在宫颈癌筛查分流中的价值对比分析[J]. 诊断病理学杂志, 2024, 31(06): 508-512.
[8] 张忠原, 朱萍. Reid阴道镜评分、HPV E6/E7 mRNA表达量在宫颈癌中的临床应用价值研究[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2024, 21(12): 1721-1726.
[9] 张小松, 杜芸, 董燕, 等. 《人工智能辅助宫颈细胞学诊断技术的应用及质量控制专家共识》解读[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2024, 35(03): 1-4.
[10] 翟嘉怡, 谷丽娟, 范永红, 等. 高危型人乳头瘤病毒负荷量与宫颈癌前病变的相关性分析[J]. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版), 2024, 40(10): 11-13.
[11] 单灵钰, 梁靓, 马明妍, 等. 宫颈液基细胞学检查联合阴道镜Reid评分在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用价值[J]. 妇儿健康导刊, 2024, 3(12): 88-91.
[12] 张呈玲, 马巧玉, 李娟, 等. Reid阴道镜评分与宫颈病变HPV感染相关性研究[J]. 人民军医, 2020, 63(06): 582-585.
[13] MA Y, DI J, BI H, et al.Comparison of the detection rate of cervical lesion with TruScreen, LBC test and HPV test: A Real-world study based on population screening of cervical cancer in rural areas of China[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(7): e0233986.
[14] 张安慧, 朱敏, 毛建, 等. 人工智能技术在女性宫颈癌筛查中的应用分析 [J]. 中国卫生信息管理杂志, 2024, 21 (5): 739-744+750.
[15] 钟梅, 蔡丹丹, 关珊珊, 等. 人工智能宫颈癌筛查系统(TS01)联合阴道镜在宫颈病变筛查中的临床应用[J]. 智慧健康, 2023, 9(33): 1-4.
基金
北京市医院管理中心重点医学专业发展计划建设项目(ZYLX202112)