床旁经胸超声心动图对暴发性心肌炎与心肌梗死后行VA-ECMO支持患者的左心功能评估

杨薇, 徐明, 王得恩, 章向成

湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2023, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) : 52-56.

PDF(2203 KB)
PDF(2203 KB)
湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2023, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1) : 52-56.
临床医学

床旁经胸超声心动图对暴发性心肌炎与心肌梗死后行VA-ECMO支持患者的左心功能评估

  • 杨薇1, 徐明1, 王得恩2, 章向成3
作者信息 +

Bedside Transthoracic Echocardiography in Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Fulminant Myocarditis and Myocardial Infarction Undergoing VA-ECMO Support

  • YANG Wei1, XU Ming1, WANG De'en2, ZHANG Xiangcheng3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的: 利用床旁经胸超声心动图对暴发性心肌炎与心肌梗死后行VA-ECMO支持患者的左心收缩功能进行评估,探讨床旁超声心动图在VA-ECMO支持治疗时的应用价值。方法: 回顾性分析在我院行VA-ECMO支持的患者32例,选取心源性休克并成功撤机的患者16例,分为暴发性心肌炎(8例)、心肌梗死(8例)两组,对两组内和两组间的一般临床资料以及VA-ECMO支持建立前、建立后24h和成功撤机后的左房内径(LAD)、左室舒张末期内径(LVDD)及射血分数(LVEF)进行对比。结果: (1)一般临床资料比较:较心肌梗死组平均年龄(64.1±6.9岁),暴发性心肌炎组的平均年龄(34.2±9.0岁)更小。(2)组内比较:暴发性心肌炎组LVDD在VA-ECMO支持建立前平均水平(42.9±9.5)mm低于建立后24h平均水平(46.7±8.8)mm;成功撤机后LVEF平均水平(51.5±21.3)%高于建立后24h平均水平(33.9±18.4)%。心肌梗死组在VA-ECMO支持建立前、建立后24h、成功撤机后的LAD、LVDD及LVEF组内比较均无统计学差异。(3)两组间对比:暴发性心肌炎组LAD在VA-ECMO支持建立前、建立后24h和成功撤机后均低于急性心肌梗死组;VA-ECMO支持建立前心肌梗死组LVDD平均水平大于暴发性心肌炎组;成功撤机后暴发性心肌炎组的LVEF高于急性心肌梗死组。结论: VA-ECMO支持可以明显改善暴发性心肌炎组患者的LVEF,暴发性心肌炎对心功能的影响可能可逆;VA-ECMO支持对心肌梗死组LAD、LVDD、LVEF的改善不明显,但可以为其他目的的治疗争取一段时间;暴发性心肌炎组LAD在VA-ECMO支持建立前、建立后24h和成功撤机后转出ICU前均低于急性心肌梗死组;年龄、LAD、LVDD可能影响心功能的恢复。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the left ventricular systolic function of patients with fulminant myocarditis and myocardial infarction during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) therapy using bedside transthoracic echocardiography, so as to explore the application value of bedside echocardiography during VA-ECMO therapy. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on 32 patients undergoing VA-ECMO support in our hospital. Sixteen patients with cardiogenic shock and successful weaning were selected and divided into two groups: the fulminant myocarditis group (n=8) and the myocardial infarction group (n=8). Further inter-group and intra-group comparisons were performed on the general clinical data, left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before VA-ECMO support, 24 hours after VA-ECMO support, and after the successful weaning, respectively. Results (1) Comparison of general clinical data: The average age of the fulminant myocarditis group was smaller than that of the myocardial infarction group [(34.2±9.0) vs. (64.1±6.9) years]. (2) Comparison within groups: The average level of LVDD before VA-ECMO support establishment in explosive myocarditis group was lower than that after 24h (46.7±8.8) mm. The average level of LVEF after successful weaning was higher than that 24 hours after VA-ECMO support [ (51.5±21.3) % vs. (33.9±18.4) %]. Furthermore, in the myocardial infarction group, there were no significant differences in LAD, LVDD and LVEF before VA-ECMO support was established, 24h after VA-ECMO support was established, and after successful withdrawal. (3) Comparison between the two groups: The LAD in explosive myocarditis group was lower than that in acute myocardial infarction group before VA-ECMO support was established, 24h after VA-ECMO support was established and after successful withdrawal. The average LVDD level of the myocardial infarction group was higher than that of the fulminant myocarditis group before VA-ECMO support. Besides, The LVEF of explosive myocarditis group was higher than that of acute myocardial infarction group. Conclusions VA-ECMO support can significantly improve LVEF in patients with myocarditis and the impact of fulminant myocarditis on cardiac function is possibly reversible. VA-ECMO support did not significantly improve LAD, LVDD and LVEF in myocardial infarction group, but could buy a period of time for other purposes of treatment. LAD in explosive myocarditis group was lower than that in acute myocardial infarction group before VA-ECMO support was established, 24h after VA-ECMO support was established, and before ICU transfer after successful withdrawal . Age, LAD and LVDD may affect the recovery of cardiac function.

关键词

VA-ECMO / 超声心动图 / 左心功能 / 暴发性心肌炎 / 心肌梗死

Key words

VA-ECMO / echocardiography / left ventricular function / fulminant myocarditis / myocardial infarction

引用本文

导出引用
杨薇, 徐明, 王得恩, 章向成. 床旁经胸超声心动图对暴发性心肌炎与心肌梗死后行VA-ECMO支持患者的左心功能评估[J]. 湖南师范大学学报医学版. 2023, 20(1): 52-56
YANG Wei, XU Ming, WANG De'en, ZHANG Xiangcheng. Bedside Transthoracic Echocardiography in Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Fulminant Myocarditis and Myocardial Infarction Undergoing VA-ECMO Support[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science). 2023, 20(1): 52-56
中图分类号: R542.2+1   

参考文献

[1] Preau S, Bortolotti P, Colling D, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of the inferiorvenac avacollapsi bilitytopr edictf luid responsive nessin spontaneously breathing patients with sepsis and acute circulatory failure[J]. Crit Care Med, 2017, 45(3): e290-e297.
[2] 郭娟, 王浩, 杨远婷, 等. 超声心动图参数对难治性心源性休克患者静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合撤机后短期预后的预测价值[J]. 中华医学影像学杂志, 2021, 30(10): 829-835.
[3] Wang L, Wang H, Hou X.Clinical outcomes of adult patients who receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2018, 32(5): 2087-2093.
[4] Na SJ, Yang JH, Yang JH, et al.Left heart decompression at venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation in cardiogenic shock: prophylactic versus therapeutic strategy[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(9) : 3746-3756.
[5] 郭娟, 易仁凤, 王浩, 等. 超声对急性暴发性心肌炎患者静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合支持下血流动力学评估的初步研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2019, 28(11): 927-932.
[6] 国家老年医学中心国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心, 中国老年医学学会心血管病分会, 北京医学会心血管病学会影像学组. 中国成人心力衰竭超声心动图规范化检查专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2019, 34(05): 422-436.
[7] Keebler ME, HaddadEV, Choi CW, et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock[J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2018, 6(6): 503-516.
[8] McRae K, de Perrot M. Principles and indications of extracorporeal life support in general thoracic surgery[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(suppl8): S931-S946.
[9] Jayaraman AL, Cormican D, Shah P, et al.Cannulation strategies in adult veno-arterial and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: techniques, limitations, and special considerations[J]. Ann Card Anaesth, 2017, 20(suppl): S11-S18.
[10] Kulkarni T, Sharma NS, Diaz-Guzman E.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults: apractcal guide for internists[J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2016, 83(5): 373-384.
[11] Rao P, Khalpey Z, Smith R.Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 2018, 11(9): e004905.
[12] 张忠满, 陈旭峰, 张劲松, 等. 急性暴发性心肌炎患者体外膜肺氧合治疗后左心收缩功能观察研究[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2020, 29(02): 213-216.
[13] Puerto E, Tavazzi G, Gambaro A, et al.Interaction between VA-ECMO and the right ventricle[J]. Hellenic J Cardiol, 2022, 68: 17-24.
[14] Welker CC, Huang J, Boswell MR, et al.Left Ventricular Decompression in VA-ECMO: Analysis of Techniques and Outcomes[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2022, 36(11): 4192-4197.
[15] Napp LC, Kühn C, Hoeper MM, et al.Cannulation strategies for percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2016, 105: 283-296.
[16] Distelmaier K, Niessner A, Haider D, et al.Long-term mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac assist after cardiovascular surgery[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39: 1444-1451.
[17] Chocron S, Perrotti A, Durst C, et al.Left ventricular venting through the right subclavian artery access during peripheral extracorporeal life support[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2013, 17: 187-189.

基金

淮安市科技项目(HAP202105); 2020年度省第五期“333工程”科研项目资助计划(BRA2020233)

PDF(2203 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/