Objective To explore the risk factors of poor postoperative recovery of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion treated by transforaminal endoscopic TESSYS technology, and to construct and validate the relevant prediction model. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion who underwent transforaminal endoscopic TESSYS technology treatment in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021, and all the data of the patients were collected. LASSO regression was used to screen the risk factors for poor recovery after endoscopic TESSYS in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. The mediating parameter λ in LASSO regression was verified by the 10-fold cross-validation method. Variables with λ not being 0 were selected and included in the multivariate Logistic regression model. To establish a risk factor prediction model for poor recovery after transforaminal endoscopic TESSYS in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. Based on the results of the prediction model, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. The model was internally verified by using Bootstrap for repeated sampling (1000 times), and the consistency index (C-index) could be obtained through calculation. Results According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 100 patients were enrolled. Among them, 33 cases had poor postoperative recovery and 67 cases had good recovery. Univariate analysis indicated 8 significantly different indicators. Using LASSO regression dimensionality reduction processing, 7 optimal modeling indicators were indicated, and Logistic regression analysis was conducted on them. Eventually, 3 indicators were obtained: age, combined diabetes, combined osteoporosis, and a risk factor model was constructed: Logi(P)=-1.159+0.681×age+0.291×combined diabetes+0.428×combined osteoporosis. The assessment showed that the C-index of this model was 0.922. The AUC was 0.901(95% CI: 0.863-0.945), and the model had a good predictive ability. Conclusion In this study, a prediction model for poor postoperative recovery of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion treated by transforaminal endoscopic TESSYS technology was established based on LASSO-Logistic, and it has good predictive ability and good application value in clinical practice.
Key words
lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion /
transforaminal endoscopic tessys procedure /
prognosis /
prediction model
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 张杰, 方后山, 王文亮, 等. 经椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2024, 27(02): 158-161.
[2] 肖莹, 宋悦, 王思敏, 等. 子午流注穴位贴敷联合穴位按摩对腰椎间盘突出症患者术后疼痛程度及腰椎功能的影响[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2024, 21(06): 829-831, 837.
[3] 袁伟, 高升, 俞军卫, 等. 腰椎间盘突出症患者心理弹性和社会支持水平对术后恐动症发生情况的影响[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2023, 44(06): 1011-1015.
[4] 周志平, 徐沁, 严飞, 等. 经皮椎间孔镜下TESSYS技术与MED术治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效比较[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2024, 39(11): 1201-1204.
[5] 张景卫, 王准, 杜焕民, 等. 经椎间孔脊柱内镜治疗老年腰椎间盘突出疗效不佳原因分析[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2024, 30(10): 757-763.
[6] 中国康复医学会脊柱脊髓专业委员会基础研究与转化学组. 腰椎间盘突出症诊治与康复管理指南[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2022, 60(5): 8.
[7] 李家华, 路友群, 薛刚, 等. 个体化预测经皮椎间孔镜下微创技术治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症术后恢复不佳的风险模型建立[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2023, 44(04): 604-607, 610.
[8] 李琳, 郭建. 循经针刺联合隔姜灸对腰椎间盘突出症继发坐骨神经痛的临床研究[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2023, 44(02): 242-244.
[9] 尹帅, 庞胤, 刘媛媛, 等. 经皮椎间孔镜TESSYS技术对腰椎间盘突出症患者腰部疼痛程度及腰椎功能的影响[J]. 中南医学科学杂志, 2022, 50(06): 909-911, 948.
[10] LUO M, WANG Z, ZHOU B, et al.Risk factors for lumbar disc herniation recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a meta-analysis of 58 cohort studies[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2023, 46(1): 159.
[11] SHI H, ZHU L, JIANG ZL, et al.Radiological risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective matched case-control study[J]. Eur Spine J, 2021, 30(4): 886-892.
[12] ZHIVODERNIKOV IV, KIRICHENKO TV, MARKINA YV, et al.Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Osteoporosis[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(21): 15772.
[13] BORCIANI G, MONTALBANO G, BALDINI N, et al.Co-culture systems of osteoblasts and osteoclasts: Simulating in vitro bone remodeling in regenerative approaches[J]. Acta Biomater, 2020, 108: 22-45.
[14] 陈莉, 雷静, 尤浩军. 脊髓损伤后病理性疼痛发生机制及治疗研究进展[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2022, 28(11): 843-848.
[15] 赵红梅, 俞璐. 基于磁共振成像参数和临床特征分析腰椎间盘突出症经皮椎间孔镜椎间盘切除术疗效的影响因素[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2024, 30(09): 78-84.
[16] 朱明, 魏晓宇. 腰椎间盘突出骨质疏松伴病理性骨折对患者睡眠时间和睡眠质量的影响[J]. 世界睡眠医学杂志, 2022, 9(02): 221-223.
[17] 郑美斯, 王晶璞, 张淼. 达格列净联合司美格鲁肽治疗二甲双胍治疗血糖控制不佳老年2型糖尿病患者的疗效及其对胰岛功能、氧化应激反应的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2023, 22(14): 1492-1496.
[18] 马有伟, 于建平, 李正凯, 等. 加强血糖监测与管理对胃癌术后伴代谢综合征患者肠外营养支持期间血糖波动情况及腹腔感染的影响[J]. 生命科学仪器, 2025, 23(02): 160-162.