Objective To explore the application effect of cluster intervention in patients with hypertension after maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) so as to provide reference for the optimization of clinical nursing plans. Methods A total of 160 patients with hypertension undergoing MHD in the hospital were enrolled between January and December 2024. According to random number table method, they were divided into observation group (cluster intervention, n=80) and control group (routine nursing, n=80). The self-efficacy [Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale (SECD6)], blood pressure control, blood glucose fluctuation and complications in the two groups were compared. Results After 3 months of intervention, scores of SECD6(common management confidence, common management behavior) and total score in observation group were (17.05±1.67) points, (30.42±3.25) points and (47.47±4.92) points, higher than those in control group [(14.43±2.29) points, (24.93±3.78) points, (39.36±6.07) points; P<0.05]. After 3 months of intervention, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in observation group were (127.93±13.45) mmHg and (87.65±7.93) mmHg, lower than those in control group [(135.07±14.96) mmHg, (92.94±8.61) mmHg; P<0.05]. After 3 months of intervention, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion and largest amplitude of glycemic excursion in observation group were (1.92±0.50) mmol/L and (3.06±0.93) mmol/L, lower than those in control group [(2.32±0.58) mmol/L, (3.98±1.06) mmol/L; P<0.05]. The incidence of complications in observation group was lower than that in control group (6.25% vs 16.25%, P<0.05). Conclusion Cluster intervention can improve self-efficacy, effectively control blood pressure, improve blood glucose fluctuation and reduce complications in MHD patients with hypertension.
Key words
hypertension /
maintenance hemodialysis /
evidence-based /
cluster intervention /
self-efficacy /
blood glucose fluctuation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 王莹莹, 包沙沙, 邓金莹, 等. 自我表露干预对维持性血液透析患者领悟社会支持、焦虑及应对方式的影响[J]. 湖南师范大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 21(1): 148-153.
[2] 陈庆云, 马亚琼, 苏裕. 维持性血液透析患者血清SAA、YKL-40、HBP与透析导管相关性感染及预后的相关性分析[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2024, 16(5): 868-871, 876.
[3] 宋雯, 翁艳秋, 梁新蕊, 等. 维持性血液透析合并高血压患者自我管理行为的潜在剖面分析[J]. 海军医学杂志, 2025, 46(3): 280-285.
[4] 韩雨, 曲志杰, 封文媛, 等. 维持性血液透析患者透析中血糖变化及低血糖发生情况分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2023, 22(6): 421-425.
[5] 梁戈, 梁艳萍, 黎晓辉, 等. 维持性血液透析患者抑郁与社会支持及自我效能的关系[J]. 国际精神病学杂志, 2024, 51(5): 1618-1621.
[6] 王轲文, 胡敏, 江秀秀. 基于结构化健康教育理念的Neuman护理对维持性血液透析患者自护能力、心智觉知度及水钠控制依从性的影响[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2024, 39(8): 1138-1142.
[7] 姜凌燕, 翁丽娜, 蒋轶波. 延续性护理对维持性血液透析患者自我管理能力及生活质量的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2023, 32(14): 2025-2028.
[8] 黄丽, 王淑萍, 安晓菊. 基于循证的集束化干预对终末期肾病透析患者低血压的预防效果[J]. 河北医药, 2023, 45(16): 2557-2560.
[9] 中关村肾病血液净化创新联盟血液净化模式选择专家共识工作组, 左力. 血液净化模式选择专家共识 (2025版)[J]. 中国血液净化, 2025, 24(9): 705-725.
[10] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会, 高血压联盟 (中国), 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会高血压分会, 等. 中国高血压防治指南 (2024年修订版)[J]. 中华高血压杂志, 2024, 32(7): 603-700.
[11] 徐绍莲, 金超, 汪娟, 等. 中青年维持性血液透析病人生活质量与健康素养及自我效能的相关性研究[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2024, 49(4): 548-553.
[12] 许亚宁, 程夏飞, 魏海亮, 等. 多学科协作联合集束化管理模式在高血压脑出血手术患者中的应用效果[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2023, 32(16): 2306-2309.
[13] 李亚, 郭丹丹, 高茜茜. 赋能教育的集束化护理干预对肝癌介入治疗患者的效果评价[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2023, 20(4): 575-579.
[14] 查夏琴, 李文龙, 李馨蕾, 等. 基于IKAP理论在改善血液透析患者容量自我管理能力中的效果分析[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2024, 21(2): 270-273.
[15] 周艳, 王奕, 恽丽萍. 生活希望计划护理在尿毒症血液透析患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2024, 30(13): 81-84.
[16] 秦岚, 张燕, 刘蕊, 等. 基于危害分析及关键控制点原则的集束化护理在高血压脑出血患者中的应用[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2023, 43(2): 388-393.
[17] 张怡, 王晓云, 刘玉芳, 等. 集束化护理干预对2型糖尿病患者血糖管理的效果研究[J]. 安徽医学, 2024, 45(11): 1444-1447.
[18] 王文峰, 吴岚, 张永志, 等. 运动疗法对血液透析患者透析充分性、血糖水平及生活质量的影响[J]. 中国中西医结合肾病杂志, 2022, 23(4): 363-365.
[19] 邓天娇, 蒋亚芬, 张青云, 等. 基于列线图的维持性血液透析患者生存预后预测[J]. 湖南师范大学学报 (医学版), 2024, 21(2): 107-113.