Objective To develop a precise blood pressure control scheme for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) combined with chest and abdominal injuries in the early stage, and to observe its application effect. Methods This study was a retrospective + prospective study with a single-centre two-stage design, retrospectively analyzed the clinical case data of patients with TBI combined with thoracic and abdominal injuries who visited our hospital from June 2020 to April 2023, and were included in the control group (n=61), and prospectively studied the patients with TBI combined with thoracic, and abdominal injuries who visited our hospital from May 2023 to February 2025, and were included in the precision group (n=59), and the control group was treated with conventional blood pressure management, and the precision group used an individualised blood pressure regulation program based on multimodal monitoring. Neurological function, haemodynamic indices, organ function (e. g. blood lactate, oxygenation index), complication rate and 6-month survival rate after 24 h, 72 h and 7 d of treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The precision group exhibited higher Glasgow Coma Scale scores than the conventional group at 72 hours and 7 days post-treatment. At 24 hours and 72 hours post-treatment, the precision group demonstrated more normalized levels of mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and cardiac index compared to the conventional group. Blood lactate levels were lower in the precision group at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days post-treatment. The incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, secondary hemorrhage, and hypoperfusion-related cerebral ischemic events was lower in the precision group than in the control group. At 24 h, 72 h, and 7 d post-treatment, the precision group exhibited significantly higher mean intracranial pressure. Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure was higher in the precision group only at 7 d post-treatment. Patients in the precision group demonstrated significantly higher Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at discharge, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment compared to the conventional group. Within 6 months, the precision group reported 3 cases of secondary epilepsy and 1 case of cognitive impairment. The long-term complication rate and readmission rate in the precision group were both 6.78% (4/59), significantly lower than the conventional group. The 6-month survival rate was 79.66% (47/59) in the precision group and 66.10% (39/61) in the conventional group, showing no statistically significant difference. Conclusion Precision blood pressure management in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) complicated by thoracic and abdominal injuries effectively balances cerebral perfusion with hemorrhagic risk, improves neurological function and 6-month outcomes, reduces the risk of ARDS and hypoperfusion-related cerebral ischemic events, maintains organ perfusion within reasonable ranges to some extent, and enhances short-term prognosis. However, it does not reduce the risk of long-term mortality.
Key words
traumatic brain injury /
thoracic and abdominal combined injury /
blood pressure control /
precision medicine /
prognosis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] IDERDAR Y, SAAD E, ELKHOUDRI N, et al.Characterizing the progress in traumatic brain injuries research in North Africa: a systematic review[J]. Pan Afr Med J, 2023, 46: 99.
[2] PELAH AI, KAZIMIERSKA A, CZOSNYKA M, et al.Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Brain Injury: Physiological Relationships and Outcome[J]. Neurosurgery, 2025, 97(4): 863-872.
[3] 高明, 周虎, 郭瑁, 等. 《欧洲创伤性严重出血和凝血病管理指南 (第6版) 》解读[J]. 中国输血杂志, 2024, 37(03): 357-368.
[4] KARTAL A, ROBBA C, HELMY A, et al.How to Define and Meet Blood Pressure Targets After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2024, 41(2): 369-385.
[5] ROSSAINT R, AFSHARI A, BOUILLON B, et al.The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition[J]. Crit Care, 2023, 27(1): 80.
[6] 周吉成, 胡丽华, 马现君, 等. 创伤性出血患者血液管理专家共识 (2022年版)[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2022, 15(06): 469-476.
[7] MEHTA R, GP TRAINEE, CHINTHAPALLI K, et al.Glasgow coma scale explained[J]. BMJ, 2019, 2(365): 1296.
[8] 陈孝平, 汪建平, 赵继宗. 外科学 (第9版) [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2019: 194.
[9] MADUZ R, KUGELMEIER P, MEILI S, et al.Major influence of interobserver reliability on polytrauma identification with the Injury Severity Score (ISS): Time for a centralised coding in trauma registries[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(4): 885-889.
[10] 陈翔宇, 刘红升, 向强, 等. 创伤失血性休克中国急诊专家共识 (2023)[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2023, 24(12): 609-623.
[11] PINGGERA D, GEIGER P, THOMÉ C.[Traumatic brain injury][J]. Nervenarzt, 2023, 94(10): 960-972.
[12] 封铭恒, 余永铭, 郭奕浩, 等. 血压变异性对重型颅脑损伤患者大骨瓣减压术预后的预测价值[J]. 中国急救医学, 2023, 43(07): 538-544.
[13] 杨炳男, 史锡文, 迁荣军. 精准血压管理预防烟雾病患者围手术期脑过度灌注综合征的效果及对预后的影响[J]. 郑州大学学报 (医学版), 2025, 60(01): 114-118.
[14] ZOERLE T, BEQIRI E, ÅKERLUND C, et al.Intracranial pressure monitoring in adult patients with traumatic brain injury: challenges and innovations[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2024, 23(9): 938-950.
[15] TRAN C, FREDERICK H, BAQAI H, et al.Traumatic brain injury and intraparenchymal hemorrhage progression: Blood pressure variability matters[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2022, 52: 119-127.
[16] 贺亚龙, 刘文博. 颅脑创伤后加重继发性脑损伤的危险因素防治专家共识[J]. 临床神经外科杂志, 2020, 17(03): 241-249, 253.
[17] SALASKY VR, CHANG WW.Neurotrauma Update[J]. Emerg Med Clin North Am, 2023, 41(1): 19-33.
[18] 薛贻敏, 黄廷烽, 陈美琪, 等. 每搏连续无创血压监测系统监测脉压变异度指导外科术后患者液体复苏的临床研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2022, 44(06): 595-600.
[19] 吕朝玉. 自发性脑出血急性期血肿扩大的影响因素[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(09): 1112.
[20] 张巧云, 李锐. 术中血压管理对老年腹部大手术患者术后早期急性肾损伤的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(07): 894-898.
[21] 宋天娇, 王小亭, 晁彦公. 颗粒化多模态监测与血流动力学研究[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2022, 13(06): 942-947.