Clinical observation on sedative effects of Midazolam and Propofol combined with Remifentanil in elderly patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage undergoing mechanical ventilation

CHEN Lu, XU Yi, GUO Yan

Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science) ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4) : 98-102.

PDF(1739 KB)
PDF(1739 KB)
Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science) ›› 2025, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4) : 98-102.
Clinical Medicine

Clinical observation on sedative effects of Midazolam and Propofol combined with Remifentanil in elderly patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage undergoing mechanical ventilation

  • CHEN Lu1,2, XU Yi2, GUO Yan1,3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To observe the sedative effects of Midazolam combined with Remifentanil versus Propofol combined with Remifentanil in elderly patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage undergoing mechanical ventilation. Methods A total of 75 elderly patients with severe intracerebral hemorrhage who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were admitted to Longnan City First People's Hospital from January 2023 to February 2025 were collected. They were divided into an observation group (40 cases) and a control group (35 cases) based on the use of different sedative drugs. Both groups received Remifentanil for analgesia. On this basis, the control group patients received Midazolam for sedation, while the observation group received Propofol for sedation. The sedative effect, hemodynamic indicators, blood gas indicators at different time points after medication, the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) scores and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores between the two groups at different time points (2, 8, 24, and 48 hours after medication). The heart rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group at all time points. There was no significant difference in systolic blood pressure between the two groups at different time points, and no significant difference in diastolic blood pressure in the observation group at 24 and 48 hours; however, the diastolic blood pressure in the observation group at 2 and 8 hours was lower than that of the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and vomiting between the two groups, but the incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in the observation group than in the control group. Conclusion Both midazolam and propofol can meet the sedation requirements of elderly patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage undergoing mechanical ventilation. The midazolam group has little effect on blood gas indicators and hemodynamics, and the overall incidence of adverse events should not be low. It is an ideal sedation mode for elderly patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Key words

elderly severe cerebral hemorrhage / mechanical ventilation / midazolam / propofol / effect observation

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHEN Lu, XU Yi, GUO Yan. Clinical observation on sedative effects of Midazolam and Propofol combined with Remifentanil in elderly patients with severe cerebral hemorrhage undergoing mechanical ventilation[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science). 2025, 22(4): 98-102

References

[1] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑出血诊治指南 (2019)[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2019, 52(12): 994-1005.
[2] 骆明涛, 伍聪, 陶传元, 等. 《高血压性脑出血中国多学科诊治指南》急救诊治解读[J]. 中国急救医学, 2021, 41(3): 185-190.
[3] CHAMBERGO-MICHILOT D, BRAÑEZ-CONDORENA A, ALVA-DIAZ C, et al. Evidence-Based Appraisal of Blood Pressure Reduction in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Scoping Review and Overview[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2021, 202: 106497.
[4] WU S, WU B, LIU M, et al.Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2019, 18(4): 394-405.
[5] 翟屹, 杨帆, 李天琪, 等. 中国卒中疾病负担与经济负担的整合分析[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2025, 20(5): 566-580.
[6] 刘勤, 汪锐, 徐丽莎, 等. 老年脑卒中患者机械通气镇静镇痛策略优化研究进展[J]. 老年医学与保健, 2023, 29(1): 172-176.
[7] 刘文鹏, 郑冬, 黄家明, 等. 自发性脑出血患者767例流行病学分析[J]. 中国综合临床, 2015, 31(1): 33-35.
[8] 李晶. 镇痛镇静规程在有创机械通气患者中的临床应用研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21(3): 438-440.
[9] 中华医学会重症医学分会. 中国成人ICU镇痛和镇静治疗指南[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2018, 30(6): 497-514.
[10] 李孟阳, 屈瀚. 丙泊酚联合用药对脑出血患者术后自主呼吸恢复时间的影响[J]. 航空航天医学杂志, 2022, 33(7): 786-789.
[11] 李昶. ICU病人镇痛镇静研究新进展[J]. 河北医学, 2013, 19(4): 614-616.
[12] XUAN G, ZHANG Y, CUI J, et al.Propofol-associated serious adverse events: an analysis of the FAERS database[J]. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev, 2024, 40(3): 2874-2887.
[13] VAN S, LAM V, PATEL K, et al.Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Articles[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(10): e46497.
[14] 贺慈, 罗金花. 咪达唑仑与丙泊酚在急诊危重症机械通气患者中的应用效果[J]. 吉林医学, 2022, 43(4): 986-987.
[15] 张政华, 王亚超. 丙泊酚联合右美托咪定对高血压脑出血患者术后镇静镇痛效果分析[J]. 医药前沿, 2023, 13(14): 52-54.
[16] 刘婷. 丙泊酚剂量对ICU机械通气患者镇静效果、生理及生化指标的影响[J]. 江西医药, 2022, 57(11): 1766-1768.
[17] 官素虹. 咪达唑仑联合芬太尼在ICU高血压脑出血患者术后镇静镇痛中的效果[J]. 四川生理科学杂志, 2022, 44(4): 679-680, 712.
[18] 王亚超, 张政华. 咪达唑仑复合舒芬太尼静脉泵入对脑出血患者术后的镇静镇痛效果分析[J]. 医药前沿, 2023, 13(11): 85-87.
[19] 韩晓丽, 丛旭晖, 李金瑞. 基于JAK2/STAT 3通路探讨咪达唑仑对缺血性脑卒中模型大鼠的神经保护作用[J]. 卒中与神经疾病, 2025, 32(3): 234-240.
[20] 蓝沁舟, 方芳, 仓静. 阿片类药物及其使用的新进展[J]. 中国临床医学, 2023, 30(4): 736-742.
PDF(1739 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/