Objective Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-tuberculosis fixed-dose combination (FDC) in the treatment of primary tuberculosis. Methods A computerized search was conducted to identify publicly available literature on the treatment of primary tuberculosis with anti-tuberculosis fixed-dose combinations in PubMed, Web of Science, China Knowledge, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and Wipu. com databases for the period from the time of database creation to October 2024. The keywords included “tuberculosis”, “chemotherapy”, “fixed-dose combination”, “tuberculosis”, “Fixed-dose Combination”. The experimental subjects were patients with primary tuberculosis, and the experimental group was treated with anti-tuberculosis FDC, while the control group was treated with traditional plate drugs. The information of the included literature was extracted, including the first author, year of publication, sample size, etc.; Cochrane evaluation method was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature; the main outcome indicators included sputum conversion at the end of February and at the end of the treatment, treatment efficiency, incidence of adverse effects, shadow absorption, and cavity closure. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata MP 18 and RevMan 5.4 software; Finally, publication bias was analyzed using Begg′s and Egger′s tests. Results Nine papers were finally included, containing a total of 4 680 cases in the experimental group and 4 712 cases in the control group, and the selection bias of each paper was low risk. Meta-analysis showed that the sputum conversion at the end of February in the experimental group (RR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.07), sputum conversion at the end of treatment (RR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.03-1.05), treatmentefficiency (RR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05), shadow absorption rate (RR=1.07, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09), and cavity closure rate (RR=1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05) were higher than those of the control group; the incidence rate of adverse reactions (RR=1.01, 95% CI: 0.93-1.09) was not statistically significant; the funnel plot results showed that the publication bias of the above effect indicators were small. Conclusion Anti-tuberculosis FDC increased the sputum conversion rate, treatment efficiency, shadow absorption rate, and cavity closure rate at the end of 2 months and at the end of treatment when compared with the quadruple anti-tuberculosis regimen alone for the treatment of first-treatment tuberculosis; there was little difference in the incidence of adverse reactions.
Key words
tuberculosis /
fixed-dose combination /
meta-analysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 舒薇, 刘宇红. 世界卫生组织《2023年全球结核病报告》解读[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(01): 15-19.
[2] LIEBENBERG D, GORDHAN B G, KANA B D.Drug resistant tuberculosis: Implications for transmission, diagnosis, and disease management[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2022, 12: 943545.
[3] 刘金友, 雒晶, 韩洪祥. 抗结核固定剂量复合剂与板式组合药治疗效果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2014, 30(12): 1614.
[4] 满世军, 许玲, 俞亚珍, 等.2008—2013年武威市抗结核固定剂量复合制剂与板式组合药使用效果分析[J]. 疾病预防控制通报, 2015, 30(02): 90-91.
[5] 陈慧娟, 马可, 杨婕, 等. 贵州省固定剂量复合剂治疗新涂阳肺结核病人的可行性研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2014, 41(05): 930-932.
[6] 付兰娥, 张进国, 张保宗, 等. 抗结核FDC与板式组合药间歇疗法临床对比观察[J]. 职业与健康, 2014, 30(10): 1435-1437.
[7] 唐晓丽, 王冬雪. 抗结核固定剂量复合剂对初治活动性肺结核治疗效果观察[J]. 慢性病学杂志, 2018, 19(07): 871-873.
[8] 曾斌. 抗结核固定剂量复合剂和板式组合药治疗肺结核应用价值对比分析[J]. 河南预防医学杂志, 2019, 30(04): 308-309.
[9] 刘辉, 包静波. 抗结核固定剂量复合剂和板式组合药治疗肺结核应用价值对比分析[J]. 医学食疗与健康, 2020, 18(04): 98-99.
[10] 郑利群, 汤伟. 抗结核固定剂量复合剂治疗涂阳肺结核患者140例临床效果分析[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2016, 9(35): 42-43.
[11] 李运葵, 何金戈, 李婷, 等. 四川省抗结核固定剂量复合制剂与板式组合药治疗效果分析[J]. 预防医学情报杂志, 2016, 32(04): 359-364.
[12] COX H S, MORROW M, DEUTSCHMANN P W J B. Long term efficacy of DOTS regimens for tuberculosis: systematic review[J]. BMJ, 2008, 336(7642): 484-487.
[13] DOOKIE N, NGEMA S L, PERUMAL R, et al.The Changing Paradigm of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment: Successes, Pitfalls, and Future Perspectives[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2022, 35(4): e0018019.
[14] WU J T, CHIU C T, WEI Y F, et al.Comparison of the safety and efficacy of a fixed-dose combination regimen and separate formulations for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment[J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2015, 70(6): 429-434.
[15] VERVER S, WARREN R M, BEYERS N, et al.Rate of reinfection tuberculosis after successful treatment is higher than rate of new tuberculosis[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005, 171(12): 1430-1435.