肉芽肿性乳腺炎肿块期患者超声图像特征与临床病理及中医证型分布的关系分析

马菲菲, 任亚娟, 徐芳, 孟畑

湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4) : 59-64.

PDF(2216 KB)
PDF(2216 KB)
湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4) : 59-64.
临床医学

肉芽肿性乳腺炎肿块期患者超声图像特征与临床病理及中医证型分布的关系分析

  • 马菲菲1, 任亚娟1, 徐芳1, 孟畑2
作者信息 +

Analysis of relationship between ultrasound image characteristics and clinicopathology and TCM syndrome type distribution in patients with granulomatous mastitis in mass stage

  • MA Feifei1, REN Yajuan1, XU Fang1, MENG Tian2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的: 探究肉芽肿性乳腺炎(granulomatous mastitis,GLM)肿块期患者超声图像特征与临床病理分期及中医证型分布的关系。方法: 回顾性选取2022年8月—2023年8月本院收治的GLM肿块期患者56例,将其纳入肿块期组,另选取同时期本院收治的GLM非肿块期(脓肿期、溃后期)患者30例,将其纳入非肿块期组。所有患者均进行多普勒超声检查并经病理确诊。比较2组患者超声图像特征差异(病灶大小、形态、边界、回声、钙化、导管扩张、血流信号),并应用多因素回归模型分析超声图像特征与GLM肿块期的关系。根据中医证候和舌脉象将患者分为肝郁痰凝证、肝胃郁热证、痰瘀互阻证、以及阳虚痰凝证4种证型,比较不同证型GLM肿块期患者超声图像特征差异。结果: 肿块期组患者病灶<6 cm、边界清晰、回声均匀、无钙化、无导管扩张、血流信号0~Ⅰ 级的比例明显高于非肿块期组,差异有统计学意义;多因素回归分析结果显示,无导管扩张、血流信号0~Ⅰ 级是GLM肿块期的独立危险因素;不同证型GLM肿块期患者超声图像血流信号组间比较,差异有统计学意义,其中阳虚痰凝证血流信号0~Ⅰ级的例数(6例,75.00%)最高,肝胃郁热证(2例,12.50%)最低。结论: 不同分期GLM患者超声图像病灶大小、边界、回声、钙化、导管扩张、血流信号等特征不同,超声图像显示无导管扩张、血流信号0~Ⅰ 级属于GLM肿块期的可能性更大;GLM肿块期不同中医证型下的超声血流信号存在一定差异,临床可利用超声血流信号进行GLM肿块期中医辨证分型的辅助诊断。

Abstract

Objective To explore the relationship between ultrasound image characteristics and clinicopathological staging and TCM syndrome type distribution in patients with granulomatous mastitis (GLM) in mass stage. Methods 56 patients with GLM in mass stage in the hospital were retrospectively selected from August 2022 to August 2023 and included in mass stage group. In addition, 30 patients with GLM in non-mass stage (abscess stage, post-ulcer stage) during the same time period were selected and enrolled as non-mass stage group. All patients underwent Doppler ultrasonography and were confirmed by pathology. The differences in ultrasound image characteristics (lesion size, shape, boundary, echo, calcification, catheter dilatation, blood flow signal) between the two groups were compared, and the relationship between ultrasound image characteristics and GLM in mass stage was analyzed by multivariate regression model. According to TCM syndrome types and tongue pulse conditions, the patients were divided into four syndromes: liver depression and phlegm coagulation syndrome, liver-stomach stagnation heat syndrome, phlegm-blood stasis blocking syndrome and yang deficiency and phlegm coagulation syndrome. The differences in ultrasound image characteristics were compared among patients with GLM in mass stage of different syndrome types. Results The proportions of lesions <6 cm, clear boundary, uniform echo, no calcification, no catheter dilatation and blood flow signal grade 0-I in mass stage group were significantly higher than those in non-mass stage group. Multivariate regression analysis showed that no catheter dilatation and blood flow signal grade 0-I were independent risk factors for GLM in mass stage. There was a statistically significant difference in the blood flow signal of ultrasound image among patients with different syndrome types of GLM in mass stage. The number of cases with blood flow signal grade 0-I in yang deficiency and phlegm coagulation syndrome (6 cases, 75.00%) was the highest, and the liver-stomach stagnation syndrome (2 cases, 12.50%) was the lowest. Conclusion The ultrasound image characteristics of lesion size, boundary, echo, calcification, catheter dilatation and blood flow signal in patients with different stages of GLM are different. Ultrasound images show that no catheter dilatation and blood flow signal grade 0-I are more likely to belong to GLM in mass stage. There are some differences in ultrasound blood flow signals under different TCM syndrome types of GLM in mass stage. Ultrasound blood flow signal can be used to assist the diagnosis of TCM syndrome differentiation of GLM in mass stage.

关键词

肉芽肿性乳腺炎 / 肿块期 / 超声 / 病理分型 / 中医证型

Key words

granulomatous mastitis / mass stage / ultrasound / pathological classification / TCM syndrome types

引用本文

导出引用
马菲菲, 任亚娟, 徐芳, 孟畑. 肉芽肿性乳腺炎肿块期患者超声图像特征与临床病理及中医证型分布的关系分析[J]. 湖南师范大学学报医学版. 2024, 21(4): 59-64
MA Feifei, REN Yajuan, XU Fang, MENG Tian. Analysis of relationship between ultrasound image characteristics and clinicopathology and TCM syndrome type distribution in patients with granulomatous mastitis in mass stage[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science). 2024, 21(4): 59-64

参考文献

[1] YUAN QQ, XIAO SY, FAROUK O, et al.Management of granulomatous lobular mastitis: an international multidisciplinary consensus (2021 edition)[J]. Mil Med Res, 2022, 9(1): 20.
[2] 楚爱景, 樊英怡, 王春晖, 等. 肉芽肿性乳腺炎的中西医治疗现状及分析[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2020, 35(12): 5971-5974.
[3] 邵牧民, 毕嘉欣. 肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎病理诊断路径[J]. 临床与实验病理学杂志, 2023, 39(9): 1042-1048.
[4] 徐娟, 刘晓璐, 赵国政, 等. 非哺乳期乳腺炎病理类型与超声表现的对比分析[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2021, 37(12): 1345-1348.
[5] 陈露阳, 彭书旺, 陈晓琼. 高频超声对肉芽肿性乳腺炎的诊断价值[J]. 精准医学杂志, 2020, 35(2): 150-152.
[6] 周瑶, 赵丹, 刘舒雷, 等. 基于"玄府气液-阳热怫郁"理论辨治肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2023, 29(12): 2109-2111.
[7] 石光煜, 张雪松, 李晶, 等. 基于超微血管成像技术探讨不同中医证型乳腺癌患者的血流特征[J]. 海军军医大学学报, 2022, 43(4): 465-469.
[8] 王朝义, 宋强, 熊鑫, 等. 肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎诊疗进展[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2023, 28(8): 910-917.
[9] 尉志红, 张鑫桃, 严继萍. 肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎的超声诊断价值[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(17): 2860-2861.
[10] 张超杰, 胡金辉, 赵希. 肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎诊治湖南专家共识 (2021版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2021, 30(11): 1257-1273.
[11] 中华中医药学会乳腺病专业委员会. 肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎中医诊疗专家共识 (2021版)[J]. 中国中西医结合外科杂志, 2022, 28(5): 597-602.
[12] OMRANIPOUR R, VASIGH M. Mastitis, Breast Abscess,Granulomatous Mastitis[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2020, 1252: 53-61.
[13] XU S, ZHU X, MIAO L, et al.Treatment of granulomatous mastitis in different stages[J]. Asian J Surg, 2022, 45(11): 2287-2288.
[14] YIN L, AGYEKUM EA, ZHANG Q, et al.Differentiation Between Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis and Breast Cancer Using Quantitative Parameters on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 876487.
[15] 司徒红林, 井含光, 刘畅, 等. 林毅运用"燮理阴阳, 立法衡通"中医综合疗法辨治肉芽肿性乳腺炎[J]. 广州中医药大学学报, 2020, 37(10): 1999-2003.
[16] 张董晓, 陈雯, 付娜, 等. 燕京外科流派分期外治肉芽肿性乳腺炎经验总结[J]. 现代中医临床, 2023, 30(6): 105-108+112.
[17] 张普, 陈震霖, 陈羽佩, 等. 论肉芽肿性乳腺炎的因机证治[J]. 陕西中医, 2022, 43(1): 97-99+107.
[18] PALA EE, EKMEKCI S, KILIC M, et al.Granulomatous Mastitis: A Clinical and Diagnostic Dilemma[J]. Turk Patoloji Derg, 2022, 38(1): 40-45.
[19] 陈薇, 牛建梅, 曹云云, 等. 肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎超声表现与临床病理学特征分析[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2021, 30(2): 82-85.
[20] LIMNINART N, HARVEY JA, SCHULTZ KJ, et al."What Do You Mean It's Not Cancer?" A Review of Autoimmune and Systemic Inflammatory Diseases Involving the Breast[J]. J Breast Imaging, 2021, 3(5): 612-625.
[21] 郑志燕, 唐文成, 徐伟, 等. 不同超声分型的肉芽肿性乳腺炎影像学特征分析[J]. 安徽医学, 2022, 43(11): 1309-1313.

基金

上海市卫生健康委员会科研课题“柴芩消痈饮治疗肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎(肝经蕴热型)的临床研究”(20224Y0163)

PDF(2216 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/