桥接组合式内固定手术与锁定加压钢板内固定术治疗四肢骨折的效果比较

张 涛,张红军

湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 170-173.

PDF(1931 KB)
PDF(1931 KB)
湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 170-173.
临床医学

桥接组合式内固定手术与锁定加压钢板内固定术治疗四肢骨折的效果比较

  • 张 涛1,张红军2
作者信息 +

Comparison of Bridging Combined with Internal Fixation and Locking Compression Plate Internal Fixation in Treatment of Limb Fractures

  • Zhang Tao1, Zhang Hong-jun2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:比较桥接组合式内固定手术与锁定加压钢板内固定术治疗四肢骨折的效果。方法:选取2015年1月~2016年7月我院收治的四肢骨折患者70例为研究对象,随机分为观察组、对照组各35例,分别实施桥接组合式内固定术、锁定加压钢板内固定术,术后随访6个月,比较两组手术一般资料,应用Constant肩关节评分、Hss膝关节评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价两组肩肘关节功能及疼痛度,采用健康调查简表(SF-36)分析其生活质量,并观察术后并发症。结果:观察组手术时间、骨折愈合时间较对照组短,术中出血量低于对照组;术后两组Constant评分、Hss评分均较同组术前明显增加,但组间对比差异无统计学意义,观察组手术后VAS评分(2.17±0.25)分低于对照组;观察组术后6个月SF-36生理方面、心理方面评分及总评分(88.34±1.67)分均明显高于对照组;观察组术后6个月随访期间,并发症发生率5.71%较对照组22.86%低。结论:桥接组合式内固定手术与锁定钢板内固定术相比,治疗四肢骨折疗效较好,可明显缩短手术时间、骨折愈合时间,术中出血量较少,术后并发症发生率低,患者生活质量明显提高,值得在临床推广应用。

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of bridge combined internal fixation and locking compression plate fixation in the treatment of limb fractures. Methods A total of 70 patients with limb fractures were selected from January 2015 to July 2016 in our Hospital. The patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 35 cases in each group: The observation group was treated with bridging combined internal fixation and the control group was given locking compression plate internal fixation. After 6 months of follow-up, the general operation data between the two groups were compared and the Constant shoulder score, and Hss knee score, visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to assess application of the function and pain degree of shoulder and elbow joint between the two groups. And the quality of life was analyzed by the short form health survey (SF-36) and the postoperative complications were observed. Results The operative time and fracture healing time were shorter in the observation group than those in the control group. The Constant score and the Hss score of the two groups after operation were increased significantly compared with the preoperative group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. The VAS score (2.17±0.25) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group. The physiological and psychological scores and total score (88.34±1.67) of SF-36 in the 6 months after the operation were significantly higher in the observation group than those in the control group. The incidence rate of complications was 5.71% in the observation group at 6 months follow-up, which was lower than that in the control group with 22.86%. Conclusion Compared with locking compression plate internal fixation, bridging combined with internal fixation is better for the treatment of limb fractures and can significantly shorten the operation time, fracture healing time, and produce less intraoperative blood loss, low postoperative complications rate, and significantly improve patients quality of life, therefore it is worth clinical application.

关键词

桥接组合式内固定术
/ 锁定加压钢板内固定术 / 四肢骨折 / Constant评分 / Mayor评分

Key words

bridging combined with internal fixation
/ locking compression plate internal fixation / limb fractures / constant score / hss score

引用本文

导出引用
张 涛,张红军.
桥接组合式内固定手术与锁定加压钢板内固定术治疗四肢骨折的效果比较
[J]. 湖南师范大学学报医学版. 2018, 15(3): 170-173
Zhang Tao, Zhang Hong-jun.
Comparison of Bridging Combined with Internal Fixation and Locking Compression Plate Internal Fixation in Treatment of Limb Fractures
[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science). 2018, 15(3): 170-173

参考文献

[1] 张伟, 万德余, 孙正, 等. 经皮桥接棒内固定治疗四肢骨折[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2015, 25(31): 105-107.
[2] 谷雨, 次仁伦珠. 滑槽植骨结合LCP固定治疗股骨骨折术后骨不连的疗效观察[J]. 医学临床研究, 2016, 33(6): 1044-1047.
[3] 熊鹰, 张仲子, 赵烽, 等. 桥接组合式内固定系统治疗不稳定型骨盆骨折[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2014, 43(11): 137-140.
[4] 赵烽, 陆继鹏, 熊鹰, 等. 桥接组合式内固定系统治疗骨盆骨折[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24(10): 889-893.
[5] 王亦璁, 姜保国. 骨与关节损伤 (第5版) [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012.
[6] 阿依努尔, 郭英. 网络健康护理对四肢骨折术后自我效能与生活质量的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2016, 33(1): 203-204, 205.
[7] 马志华. 交锁髓内钉固定与加压钢板螺钉固定治疗肱骨骨折后骨不连对比[J]. 湖南师范大学学报 (医学版), 2017, 14(1): 88-91.
[8] 杨岳聪, 何晖, 甘秀天, 等. 桥接组合式内固定系统治疗成年肱骨干骨折的疗效分析[J]. 广西医学, 2015, 37(12): 1821-1823.
[9] 翟江华.17例四肢骨折术后内固定松动断裂Ô因分析[J]. 安徽医学, 2015, 36(11): 1389-1390.
[10] 孙志波, 杨述华, 禹志宏, 等. 桥接组合式内固定系统治疗股骨骨折内固定术后再骨折[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2016, 13(5): 19-20.
[11] 关翔, 宋香全, 王洪炳等. 桥接组合式内固定系统与重建钢板治疗髋臼骨折的疗效比较[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2015, 18(5): 621-622, 626.
[12] 吕志强, 李兴华, 王爱国, 等. 桥接组合式内固定与金属锁定接骨板钉系统修复股骨干骨折的生物力学比较[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2016, 20(17): 24515-24521.
[13] 周忠水, 王军, 孟云, 等. 桥接系统对四肢和骨盆骨折的临床应用分析[J]. 中国医学装备, 2017, 14(3): 58-61.
[14] 周立, 杨红林, 沈韬, 等. 桥接组合式内固定系统治疗肱骨骨折疗效观察[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2016, 44(11): 1150-1152.
[15] 张仲子, 赵烽, 张武, 等. 新型内固定系统与锁定加压钢板系统治疗简单肱骨干骨折的对比分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志 (电子版), 2015, 9(11): 2113-2117.

桥接组合式内固定手术与锁定加压钢板内固定术治疗四肢骨折的效果比较
" title="Share on Weibo" target="_blank">
PDF(1931 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/