颅脑钻孔引流术治疗重度Â脑损伤并发高血压脑出血的疗效及对患者神经功能的影响 

罗会选,相 毅

湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 156-159.

PDF(1936 KB)
PDF(1936 KB)
湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 156-159.
临床医学

颅脑钻孔引流术治疗重度Â脑损伤并发高血压脑出血的疗效及对患者神经功能的影响 

  • 罗会选1,相 毅2
作者信息 +

The effect of craniocerebral drilling and drainage on severe craniocerebral injury complicated with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and its effect on neurological function

  • Luo Hui-xuan1, Xiang Yi 2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:研究颅脑钻孔引流术治疗重度Â脑损伤并发高血压脑出血疗效及对患者神经功能的影响。方法:选取2015年1月~2016年12月期间在我院接受诊治的200例重度颅脑损伤并发高血压脑出血患者作为研究对象,根据手术方式不同分为对照组90例、研究组110例。对照组患者采用骨瓣开Â血肿清除术治疗,研究组患者采用颅脑钻孔引流术进行治疗,术后给予两组患者1~3个月随访。比较两组患者手术时间、术后住院时间、术后再出血率及手术前后神经功能变化、临床疗效。结果:研究组手术时间、术后住院时间均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义;研究组术后患者再出血率略低于对照组,但差异无统计学差异;术后1个月两组患者的神经功能NIHSS评分均低于术前,且研究组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义;研究组治疗总有效率91.8%(101/110)高于对照组的77.8%(70/90),差异有统计学意义。结论:颅脑钻孔引流术治疗重度颅脑损伤并发高血压脑出血疗效显著,手术时间短,能有效减轻机体损伤,改善患者神经功能,促进患者康复。

Abstract

Objective To study the effect of craniocerebral drilling and drainage in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury complicated with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and its effect on neurological function. Methods 200 cases of patients with severe craniocerebral injury complicated with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage who were treated in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were enrolled in this study. According to the different surgical methods, 90 patients were divided into control group and 110 patients in the study group. The patients in the control group were treated with craniotomy and craniotomy. The patients in the study group were treated with craniotomy and drainage. The patients were followed up for 1-3 months. The operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative rebleeding rate and neurological function before and after operation were compared between the two groups. Results The operative time and postoperative hospital stay were lower in the study group than those in the control group. The rate of rebleeding was lower in the study group than in the control group, but there was no significant difference. The neurological function NIHSS score of the two groups was lower than that of the control group at 1 month after operation, and the difference was statistically significant. The total effective rate of the study group was 91.8% (101/110) higher than that of the control group (77.8%, 70/90), the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Brain drilling and drainage surgery for severe craniocerebral injury complicated by hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage significantly, short operation time, can effectively reduce the body damage, improve the patient’s neurological function, promote patient rehabilitation.

关键词

颅脑钻孔引流术
/ 重度颅脑损伤 / 高血压脑出血 / 疗效 / 神经功能

Key words

craniocerebral drilling and drainage
/ severe craniocerebral injury / hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage / efficacy / neurological function

引用本文

导出引用
罗会选,相 毅.
颅脑钻孔引流术治疗重度Â脑损伤并发高血压脑出血的疗效及对患者神经功能的影响 
[J]. 湖南师范大学学报医学版. 2018, 15(3): 156-159
Luo Hui-xuan, Xiang Yi.
The effect of craniocerebral drilling and drainage on severe craniocerebral injury complicated with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and its effect on neurological function
[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science). 2018, 15(3): 156-159

参考文献

[1] 浦奔放. 神经内镜手术与开Â血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血的疗效对比[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2014, 34(03): 786-787.
[2] 张旭辉. 重型Â脑损伤患者42例的并发症及其治疗[J]. ½苏医药, 2016, 42(08): 979-980.
[3] Kuncewitch M, Yang W L, Jacob A, et al. Stimulation of Wnt/beta–carenin signaling pathway with Wnt agonist reduces organ injury after hemorrhagic shock[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2015, 78(04): 793-900.
[4] 何安邦, 周奋, 潘德岳, 等. 锥Â穿刺抽吸引流血肿清除术治疗老年高血压脑出血的疗效[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016, 36(08): 1937-1938.
[5] 余鹏飞, 麦兴进, 符树强 . 不同手术方式治疗高血压脑出血的疗效比较及复发影响因素分析 [J]. 重庆医学, 2015, 44(13): 1839-1841.
[6] 刘建林, 朱新民, 李强, 等. 开Â术前钻孔引流术在抢救严重对冲性Â脑损伤所致脑疝中的临床应用[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2014, 19(12): 754-755.
[7] 姚益群, 刘莉萍, 傅 丹, 等. 急诊脑室引流并钻孔减压治疗外伤性后Â窝血肿致枕骨大孔疝[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2012, 17(01): 45-46.
[8] 袁运尚, 蔡可胜, 卞文彬. Â脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后硬膜下积液外引流加高压氧的治疗[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017, 17(01): 21-24.
[9] 杜福宏, 宋良鹏, 郑德伟, 等. Â脑钻孔引流术与开Â治疗高血压脑出血对神经功能及预后的影响[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2016, 19(18): 8-10.
[10] 马涛, 张玉磊, 孙政, 等. 微创钻孔引流术与小骨窗开Â术治疗中等量基底节区高血压脑出血的疗效比较 [J]. 安徽医药, 2013, 17(12): 2114-2115.
[11] 赵友林, 边佳. 紧急钻Â和顺序脑膜剪开术用于特重型Â脑损伤合并脑疝患者中的临床效果[J]. 湖南师范大学学报 (医学版), 2017, 14(04): 170-173.
[12] 党宝齐, 何卫春, 朱敏, 等. 重型Â脑损伤单侧去骨瓣减压术后对侧硬膜下积液诊疗分析[J]. 海南医学, 2015, 26(14): 2139 - 2140
[13] 张宏军. 开Â术与微创钻孔引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床分析[J]. 中国社区医师, 2014, 30(25): 11, 13.
[14] Tanaka Y, Nariai T, Nagaoka T, et a1. Quantitative evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics in patients with moyamoya disease bydynamic suseeptibility contrast magneticresonance imaging comparison with positron emission tomography[J]. JCerebBlood Flow Metab, 2016, 26(2): 291-300.
[15] 侯前亮. 高血压脑出血微创钻孔引流术75例治疗体会[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2015, 18(12): 101-102.
[16] 孙永, 孙辉, 姚¿华. 早期微创Â内血肿清除术治疗高血压脑出血 100 例的疗效分析 [J]. 重庆医学, 2013, 42(21): 2534-2536.
[17] 张跃欣. Â脑钻孔引流术与开Â治疗高血压脑出血对神经功能及预后的影响[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2017, 8(01): 59- 60.
[18] 李文贵. 开Â手术与微创钻孔引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床观察[J]. 实用临床医学, 2015, 16(05): 33-34.

颅脑钻孔引流术治疗重度Â脑损伤并发高血压脑出血的疗效及对患者神经功能的影响 
" title="Share on Weibo" target="_blank">
PDF(1936 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/