非小细胞肺癌晚期靶向药物治疗中血清肿瘤标志物预测疗效的临床意义

徐安平

湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 129-132.

PDF(1934 KB)
PDF(1934 KB)
湖南师范大学学报医学版 ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 129-132.
临床医学

非小细胞肺癌晚期靶向药物治疗中血清肿瘤标志物预测疗效的临床意义

  • 徐安平
作者信息 +

Clinical significance of serum tumor markers in predicting the efficacy of targeted drug therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

  • Xu An-ping
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的:研究肿瘤标志物癌胚抗Ô(CEA)、人鳞状细胞癌相关抗Ô(SCCAg)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)在非小细胞肺癌晚期、过程中对疗效评价的临床应用价值。方法:78例晚期非小细胞肺癌为研究对象,根据患者靶向药物治疗后不同疗效分为部分缓解组39例、稳定病变组24例、进展组15例,比较三组研究对象靶向药物治疗前与治疗八周后肿瘤标志物CEA、SCCAg、NSE血清水平的变化情况,探讨肿瘤标志物疗效评价的临床应用价值。结果:不同病理类型非小细胞肺癌肿瘤标志物比较:CEA在鳞癌、鳞腺癌、腺癌中依次升高任意组间均有统计学差异;SCCAg在腺癌、鳞腺癌、鳞癌中依次升高任意组间均有统计学差异;NSE在腺癌最高,在鳞癌、鳞腺癌中无统计学差异;部分缓解组非小细胞癌患者肿瘤标志物CEA、SCCAg、NSE血清水平均出现下降,差异有统计学意义;稳定病变组非小细胞癌患者肿瘤标志物CEA、SCCAg、NSE血清水平无明显变化;进展组部分缓解组非小细胞癌患者肿瘤标志物CEA、SCCAg、NSE血清水平均出现升高,差异有统计学意义。结论:肿瘤标志物的监测为了解分子靶向治疗效果的一个可靠途径,也是分子靶向治疗药物选择的依据。

Abstract

 Objective To study the tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and squamous cell carcinoma associated antigen (SCCAg), neuron specific enolase (NSE) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, in the process of evaluation of the efficacy of clinical application. Methods 78 cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients as the research object, according to the targeted therapy after curative effect is divided into partial remission group 39 cases, 24 cases of stable disease group, 15 cases in group, compared three groups of subjects targeted drug therapy before and after eight weeks of treatment, tumor markers CEA, SCCAg and NSE in serum the level changes of tumor markers in evaluating the therapeutic effect of clinical application. Results The results of different pathological types of non-small cell lung cancer tumor markers: CEA increased statistically in any group of squamous cell carcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma; SCCAg increased and there was significant difference in any group in adenocarcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma; NSE is the highest in adenocarcinoma, no statistically significant difference in squamous cell carcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma; partial remission group of patients with non-small cell lung cancer tumor markers CEA, SCCAg, NSE serum levels were decreased, the difference was statistically significant; stable disease group non-small cell cancer tumor markers CEA, SCCAg and NSE serum levels no significant change; partial remission in patients with tumor progression of non-small cell carcinoma markers CEA, SCCAg, NSE serum levels were elevated, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion The monitoring of tumor markers is a reliable approach to understand the effectiveness of molecular targeted therapies, and is also the basis for molecular targeted drug selection.

关键词

肿瘤标志物
/ 癌胚抗Ô /  / 人鳞状细胞癌相关抗Ô /  / 神经元特异性烯醇化酶 / 非小细胞肺癌 / 靶向药物治疗 / 疗效评价

Key words

 tumor markers
/ carcinoembryonic antigen / human squamous cell carcinoma associated antigen / neuron specific enolase / non-small cell lung cancer / targeted drug therapy / efficacy evaluation

引用本文

导出引用
徐安平.
非小细胞肺癌晚期靶向药物治疗中血清肿瘤标志物预测疗效的临床意义
[J]. 湖南师范大学学报医学版. 2018, 15(3): 129-132
Xu An-ping.
Clinical significance of serum tumor markers in predicting the efficacy of targeted drug therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
[J]. Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Science). 2018, 15(3): 129-132

参考文献

[1] 玛依À·阿不都克力木, 阿迪À·斯依提, 帕提古力·阿尔西丁. EML4-ALK融合基因在新疆维吾尔族非小细胞肺癌患者中的表达分析及其对预后的影响[J]. 湖南师范大学学报 (医学版), 2017, 14(1): 58-61.
[2] 李思文, 夏旭, 胡宁东, 等. 肝细胞生长因子对非小细胞肺癌侵袭和迁移的影响[J]. 广东医学, 2017, 38(2): 173-177.
[3] 孙立越, 周娟, 程燕君, 等. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因突变与放射敏感性的相关性[J]. 广东医学, 2017, 38(7): 981-985.
[4] 汪君君, 谢薇佳, 袁帅, 等. miRNA基因单核苷酸多态性与非小细胞肺癌易感性的关联研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2017, 39(9): 904-912.
[5] Fukuoka M. Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Biomarker analyses and final over all survival results from a phase III, randomized, open- label, first- line study of gefitinib versuscarb. p1atin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(21): 2866-2874.
[6] 袁毫. 自拟健脾益肺汤辅助治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌效果分析[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2017, 23(7): 1055-1057.
[7] Xu CA, Su H, Liu JL, et al. Value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in prediction of chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor[J]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, 2011, 33(6): 436-41.
[8] 吴东, 李丽霞, 袁亚连, 等. SIRT1与PPARγ在非小细胞肺癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 广东医科大学学报, 2017, 35(1): 1-4.
[9] Tsuta K, Mimae T, Nitta H, et al. Insulinlike growth factorireceptorprotein expression and gene copynumber alterationsin non- small cell lung carcinomas[J]. Hum Pathol, 2013, 44(61): 975-982.
[10] 葛春艳, 王岩静, 刘家驹, 等. 血清CYFRA2l-l、NSE 和CEA对晚期非小细胞肺癌NP方案化疗疗效的预测价值[J]. 航空航天医学杂志, 2012, 23(12): 1445-1446.
[11] 孙磊, 张珏. CYFRA21-1联合PTEN检测对非小细胞肺癌诊断价值分析[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2017, 24(1): 29-32.
[12] 张标, 杨军. 非小细胞肺癌表皮生长因子受体基因突变236例分析[J]. ½苏大学学报 (医学版), 2017, 27(2): 179-182.
[13] 张卉, 张树才. 非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因靶向治疗研究进展[J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2017, 20(1): 61-65.
[14] 薛洪省, 周少华, 卢万鹏, 等. 非小细胞肺癌靶向治疗的靶点研究进展 [J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2013, 16(2): 107-113.
[15] 王何刚, 陈明伟, 唐爱霞, 等 . 靶向药物联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床分析 [J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2014, 7(9): 10-11.
[16] 朱利娜, 杨振君, 王士勇, 等 . 厄洛替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的系统评价 [J]. 中国肺癌杂志, 2009, 12(12): 1229-1236.
[17] Yatabe Y. EGFR mutations and the terminal respiratory unit[J]. Cancer Metas-tasis Rev, 2010, 29(1): 23-36.
[18] Zhao L, He LR, Xi M, et al. Nimotuzumab promotes radiosensitivity of EGFR overexpression esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cels by upregulating IGFBP- 3[J]. J Transl Med, 2012, 10(2): 249.

非小细胞肺癌晚期靶向药物治疗中血清肿瘤标志物预测疗效的临床意义
" title="Share on Weibo" target="_blank">
PDF(1934 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/