不同除烟装置对手术室烟雾净化的效果评价

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (2463 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To evaluate the air purification effect of laminar ventilation system and central negative pressure suction device for the scientific use of the device. Methods A portable air quality detector was used to measure the air concentration of PM2.5 and CO₂in the operating room of a tertiary hospital in Hunan Province, and to evaluate the air purification effect of the exhaust device. Results The concentration of PM2.5 and CO₂ increased significantly at the time of surgery; the concentration of PM2.5 and CO₂ in the “laminar ventilation” operating room was lower than in the ordinary operating room; in the open surgery and endoscopic surgery, the smoke removal effect of “laminar ventilation + central negative pressure device” was better than the “laminar ventilation” device. Conclusion “Laminar ventilation system” can reduce the concentration of PM2.5 and CO₂ in surgical smoke, and the combined use of “laminar ventilation system” and “central negative pressure suction device” is better.

Key words： smoke removal device surgical smoke PM2.5 CO₂

Received: 04 July 2024

PACS:

R612

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YU Ke
	ZHOU Dai
	DENG Fengliang
	HU Jiale
	LIU Xiulan
	GAO Jianxin
	BAI Li

Cite this article:

YU Ke,ZHOU Dai,DENG Fengliang等. Evaluation of the effect of different smoke removal devices on smoke purification in the operating room[J]. HuNan ShiFan DaXue XueBao(YiXueBan), 2024, 21(5): 98-100.

URL:

http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/EN/ OR http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V21/I5/98

[1] 孙育红, 张颖, 支慧, 等. 手术室护理人员手术烟雾知识与防护行为的调查[J]. 中国护理管理, 2022, 22(04) : 529-533.
[2] 段青鸾, 洪彬芳, 林珂, 等. 《手术烟雾安全指南 (2022版) 》解读[J]. 循证护理, 2024, 10(05) : 761-764.
[3] TRAMONTINI C C, GALVÃO C M, CLAUDIO C V, et al. Composition of the electrocautery smoke: integrative literature review[J]. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 2016, 50(1) : 144-153.
[4] LEWIS A, ALLUM C, VOKES D, et al.Human papillomavirus and surgical smoke: a systematic review[J]. Occup Environ Med, 2020, 77(12): 809-817.
[5] 陈伟伟, 雷璐敏, 张宇宏, 等. 不同类型手术烟雾的危害及其防护研究进展[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2023, 44(08) : 922-927.
[6] CANICOBA A R B, DE BRITO POVEDA V. Surgical smoke andbiological symptoms in healthcare professionals and patients : asystematic review[J]. J PeriAnesth Nursing, 2022, 37(1) : 130-136.
[7] LIMCHANTRA I V, FONG Y, MELSTROM K A.Surgical smoke exposure in operating room personnel: a review[J]. JAMA Surg, 2019, 154(10): 960-967.
[8] 李卓, 田小荣, 侯泽荣, 等. 手术室不同电外科设备产生的烟雾中PM质量分数检测结果分析[J]. 护理研究, 2018, 32(18) : 2979-2980.
[9] WANG H K, MO F, MA C G, et al.Evaluation of fine particles in surgical smoke from an urologist's operating room by time and by distance[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2015, 47(10) : 1671-1678.
[10] 段青鸾, 洪彬芳, 林珂, 等. 医护人员手术烟雾防范措施的证据总结[J]. 中国护理管理, 2023, 23(09) : 1339-1343.
[11] 谭文君, 朱皓阳, 马涛, 等. 局部负压吸引对手术室烟雾PM2.5质量分数的影响[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(08) : 1325-1329.
[12] 冯笑笑. 妇科腹腔镜手术中烟雾危害的医护认知及职业暴露防护策略的探讨[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2021.
[13] 徐旭东, 赵媛. 外科手术烟雾的危害及防护措施研究进展[J]. 天津护理, 2024, 32(02) : 246-249.
[14] 李卓, 田小荣, 侯泽荣, 等. 手术室不同电外科设备产生的烟雾中PM质量分数检测结果分析[J]. 护理研究, 2018, 32(18) : 2979-2980.
[15] 杨洋, 马燕兰, 曹冠楠, 等. 除烟装置的研制及其在腹腔镜手术中清除有毒物质的作用研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(11) : 69-73.