|
|
|
| Comparison of effects of early fluid resuscitation at different rates on hemodynamics and prognosis of initially assessed non-severe acute pancreatitis |
| WU Pengyu1, LIU Jun1,2, SHAN Jing1, LIU Li1, PU Wenjing1, XUE Mei1, SUN Xiaobin1, WANG Qiong1 |
1. Department of Gastroenterology, Chengdu Third People's Hospital, Chengdu 610031, China;
2. Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan Forestry Central Hospital, Chengdu 610084, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the application effects of different rates of early fluid resuscitation on patients with non-severe acute pancreatitis (NSAP) at initial assessment. Methods The clinical data of 336 patients with NSAP at initial assessment were retrospectively analyzed. According to the early fluid infusion rate, the patients were divided into high-rate fluid infusion group (191 cases, total fluid resuscitation at 24 h >1/2 of total fluid resuscitation at 48 h after admission) and low-rate fluid infusion group (145 cases, total fluid resuscitation at 24 h ≤1/2 of total fluid resuscitation at 48 h after admission). The total fluid infusion at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after admission was recorded in the two groups, and the changes in peripheral blood biochemical indicators [C-reactive protein (CRP), hematocrit (HCT), serum creatinine (Cre) ] were compared at 12 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 7 d after admission. The prognosis were analyzed in the two groups of patients. Results The total fluid infusion at 24 h and 48 h after admission in high-rate fluid infusion group was significantly higher than that in low-rate fluid infusion group (P<0.05), and the CRP and HCT levels at 12 h after admission and CRP level at 72 h after admission, time of vital signs reaching the standard, incidence rate of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), incidence rate of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), rate of invasive (interventional) operation, mechanical ventilation rate, rate of intensive care treatment and rate of conversion to severe condition were significantly lower than those in low-rate fluid infusion group (P<0.05). Conclusion High-rate fluid infusion is beneficial to improving the hemodynamics and prognosis of patients with NSAP at initial assessment, with high clinical application value.
|
|
Received: 09 November 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 石宏哲, 王海霞, 秦铮等. MSCT灌注成像参数在重症急性胰腺炎临床诊治中的应用价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2022, 20(4): 112-114.
[2] 林乐丹, 孙素珍. 早期肠内营养护理对ICU重症急性胰腺炎转归的影响[J]. 北京医学, 2018, 40(02): 189-190.
[3] 蒋立钊, 刘石. 血清和肽素在亚特兰大新分类标准下预测急性胰腺炎严重程度的价值研究[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志, 2018, 27(7): 808-812.
[4] 刘俊, 武鹏宇, 刘莉等. 早期积极液体复苏对初始评估未达到重型标准的急性胰腺炎患者的影响研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(27): 3457-3463.
[5] 王洁, 吴青, 罗秀平, 等. 早期液体复苏达标对急性胰腺炎临床预后的影响[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2021, 26(11): 1356-1359.
[6] Hansberry DR, D'Angelo M, White MD, et al. Quantitative analysis of the level of readability of online emergency radiology-based patient education resources[J]. Emerg Radiol, 2018, 25(2): 147-152.
[7] Lucatelli P, Cini M, Benvenuti A, et al.Custom-made endograft for endo-vascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aneurysm and type B dissection: single-centre experience[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2018, 41(8): 1174-1183.
[8] 叶俊松, 吴炼, 陈道荣. 围手术期利用乳酸林格氏液积极补液预防经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术术后胰腺炎的Meta分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2019, 36(2): 124-130.
[9] 黄涛, 姚红艳, 尔启东, 等. 早期限制性液体复苏联合中药治疗对重症急性胰腺炎转归的影响[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33(10): 1969-1973.
[10] 潘月, 陈丽, 阳梅, 等. 血液灌流联合连续性血液滤过对高脂血症性急性胰腺炎患者血脂水平、血清淀粉酶、脂肪酶及CRP水平的影响[J]. 湖南师范大学学报 (医学版), 2019, 16(4): 76-79.
[11] 陈良, 蔡兆辉, 李海山. 大容量与限制性液体复苏对重症急性胰腺炎患者血流动力学及预后的影响比较[J]. 中国基层医药, 2022, 29(5): 655-659.
[12] 徐晟, 徐庆春. TNF-α、PCT、CRP和胸腔积液对急性胰腺炎早期严重程度的评估价值[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2021, 24(5): 406-409.
[13] 杜奕奇. 2019年版《中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南》解读[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2020, 33(3): 234-237.
[14] 王洋一, 陈婷. 血清CRP、PCT、LPS及IL-6对重症急性胰腺炎发生感染性胰腺坏死的预测价值分析[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2018, 33(6): 903-905+919.
[15] 周鑫, 杨桂元, 钱祝银. 《2018年美国胃肠病学会指南: 急性胰腺炎的初期处理》摘译[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2018, 34(5): 978-981.
[16] 陈俊, 周翔宇, 杨辉. 茵山莲颗粒对急性胰腺炎患者外周血MDA、SOD及IL-2、TNF-α水平的影响[J]. 湖南师范大学学报 (医学版), 2020, 17(1): 43-46.
[17] 毛恩强, 李梦娇. 重症急性胰腺炎早期液体复苏与器官功能维护[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2020, 40(7): 441-443. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 20 
