CBT螺钉联合椎弓根钉治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效观察

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (1)

全文: PDF (2398 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的: 观察经椎弓根皮质骨通道（cortical bone trajectory,CBT）螺钉联合椎弓根钉治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效。方法: 选择2020年3月—2023年3月在湖南师范大学附属湘东医院经保守治疗无效的老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症疾病患者40例,随机分为对照组（20例）和观察组（20例）,进行腰椎后路减压植骨内固定术治疗,其中对照组患者采用单纯椎弓根螺钉内固定方式,观察组患者采用CBT螺钉联合椎弓根螺钉内固定。观察两组患者术后恢复情况、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量和手术前后疼痛视觉模拟量表（visual analogue scale/score,VAS）评分、日本骨科协会评估治疗分数（Japanese orthopaedic association score,JOA）评分等。结果: 观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量和术后引流量均低于对照组。两组患者症状均得到改善,术后VAS评分低于术前,JOA评分高于术前。观察组患者术后1周的腰痛及下肢疼痛VAS评分低于对照组,但术后6月时,两组患者VAS评分比较无明显差异。两组患者术前、术后1周及术后6月时的JOA评分比较无明显差异。两组患者均未出现硬膜囊破裂、脑脊液漏、神经损伤、伤口感染等并发症。两组患者术后6月随访X线片均未见未见螺钉松动、脱落、塌陷等情况。结论: 应用CBT螺钉联合椎弓根螺钉技术进行腰椎内固定治疗老年老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症具有术区暴露范围小、出血量少、手术时间短、肌肉和软组织损伤小、螺钉把持力强等优势,早期疗效满意,具有一定的推广应用价值。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	吴钊
	孙荣祥
	张勇军
	曾钊

关键词 ：皮质骨通道, 腰椎管狭窄症, 椎弓根螺钉, 脊柱融合术, 疗效分析

Abstract：Objective To observe the clinical effect of transpedicle cortical bone channel (CBT) screw combined with pedicle nail in the treatment of senile degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods A total of 40 elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who failed to receive conservative treatment in Xiangdong Hospital Affiliated to Hunan Normal University from March 2020 to March 2023 were selected and randomly divided into control group (20 cases) and observation group (20 cases) to receive lumbar posterior decompression and bone grafting internal fixation treatment. The control group was treated with single pedicle screw internal fixation. Observation group was treated with CBT screw combined with pedicle screw. Postoperative recovery, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, VAS score before and after operation, JOA score and so on were observed in both groups. Results The operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume in observation group were lower than those in control group. Symptoms were improved in both groups, with VAS score lower after surgery and JOA score higher than before surgery. The VAS scores of lumbago and lower limb pain in the observation group were lower than those in the control group 1 week after surgery, but there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups 6 months after surgery. There was no significant difference in JOA scores between the two groups before surgery, 1 week after surgery and 6 months after surgery. There were no complications such as dural sac rupture, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, nerve injury or wound infection in the two groups. No loosening, falling off or collapse of screws were observed on X-ray films in both groups at 6 months after operation. Conclusion CBT screw combined with pedicle screw technique for lumbar internal fixation in the treatment of senile degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis has the advantages of small exposure area, less blood loss, short operation time, little muscle and soft tissue damage, strong screw holding, etc. The early curative effect is satisfactory, and has certain popularization and application value.

Key words： cortical bone channel lumbar spinal stenosis pedicle screw spinal fusion surgery efficacy analysis

收稿日期: 2024-01-12

中图分类号:

R681.5

基金资助:湖南省教育厅课题“CBT螺钉联合椎弓根钉治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效观察”（21C0003）

通讯作者: 曾钊,E-mail：2877763704@qq.com

引用本文:

吴钊, 孙荣祥, 张勇军, 曾钊. CBT螺钉联合椎弓根钉治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效观察[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2024, 21(2): 98-101. WU Zhao, SUN Rongxiang, ZHANG Yongjun, ZENG Zhao. The clinical efficacy of pedicle cortical bone tunnel (CBT) screws combined with pedicle screws in the treatment of elderly degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. HuNan ShiFan DaXue XueBao(YiXueBan), 2024, 21(2): 98-101.

链接本文:

http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V21/I2/98

[1] ODA K, OHBA T, HIROSHI Y, et al.Factors Affecting Pedicle Screw Insertional Torque in Spine Deformity Surgery[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 2021, 46(17) : E932-E938.
[2] 陶瑞宝. 探讨后路减压固定联合椎间植骨融合应用于腰椎管狭窄[J]. 中外医疗, 2020, 39(10) : 60-62.
[3] SANTONI BG, HYNES RA, MCGILVRAY KC, et al.Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pediclescrews[J]. Spine J, 2009, 9: 366-373.
[4] HUSKISSON EC.Measurement of pain[J]. Lancet, 1974, 2(7889) : 1127-1131.
[5] CHIAROTTO A, MAXWELL LJ, OSTELO RW, et al.Measurement Properties of Visual Analogue Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Pain Severity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review[J]. J Pain, 2019, 20(3) : 245-263.
[6] FUKUI M, CHIBA K, KAWAKAMI M, et al.Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: the subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2007, 12(6) : 526-532.
[7] HARO H, EBATA S, INOUE G, et al.Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of lumbar disc herniation, third edition - secondary publication[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2022, 27(1) : 31-78.
[8] SUK SI, LEE CK, KIM WJ, et al.Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 1997, 22(2) : 210-220.
[9] HU ZJ, FANG XQ, ZHOU ZJ, et al.Effect and possible mechanism of muscle-splitting approach on multifidus muscle injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(24) : e1921-e1929.
[10] HUANG P, WANG YG, XU J, et al.Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar facet screw fixation and interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment lower lumbar vertebral disease: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2017, 12(1) : 117.
[11] STERBA W, KIM DG, FYHRIE DP, et al.Biomechanical analysisof differing pedicle screw insertion angles[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2007, 22(4) : 385-391.
[12] SAKAURA H, MIWA T, YAMASHITA T, et al.Cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional pedicle screw fixation for 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical outcomes for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2018, 28(1) : 57-62.
[13] MARENGO N, MATSUKAWA K, MONTICELLI M, et al.Cortical bone trajectory screw placement accuracy with a patient-matched 3-dimensional printed guide in lumbar spinal surgery: A clinical study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 130: e98-e104.
[14] MARENGO N, BERJANO P, COFANO F, et al.Cortical bone trajectory screws for circumferential arthrodesis in lum bar degenerative spine: clinical and radiological outcomes of 101 cases[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27(Suppl 2) : 213-221.
[15] LI Y, WANG S, ZHU Z, et al.Biomechanical Analysis of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Versus Bone Cement Screw for Fixation in Porcine Spinal Low Bone Mass Model[J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2023 , 36(4) : E145-E152.
[16] MATSUKAWA K, YATO Y, NEMOTO O, et al.Morphometric mea-surement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screwinsertion using computed tomography[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2013, 26(6) : E248-253.
[17] MATSUKAWA K, YATO Y, KATO T, et al.In vivo analysis ofinsertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bonetrajectory technique[J]. Spine, 2014, 39(4) : E240-245.
[18] INCEOĞLU S, MONTGOMERY JR WH, CLAIR ST, et al. Pedicle screw insertion angle and pullout strength: comparison of 2 proposed strategies[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 14: 670-676.
[19] 丁红涛, 海涌, 刘玉增, 等. 皮质骨轨迹螺钉固定在合并骨质疏松腰椎退行性疾病手术中应用的效果[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2022, 32(12) : 1058-1066.
[20] PANJABI MM, SHIN EK, CHEN NC, et al.Internal morphologyof human cervical pedicles[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(10) : 1197-1205.
[21] 聂文磊. CBT螺钉和PS螺钉治疗腰椎疾病的临床疗效和安全性对比[D]. 芜湖: 皖南医学院, 2021.
[22] 刘正沛. 皮质骨轨道螺钉与常规椎弓根螺钉应用于单节段腰椎退变性疾病合并骨质疏松症的对比研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2022.
[23] CRAWFORD CH, OWENS RK, DJURASOVIC M, et al.Mini mally-Invasive midline posterior interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws compares favorably to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion[J]. Heliyon, 2019, 5(9) : e02423.