产褥期感染的病原菌和耐药性及其危险因素分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (9)

Download: PDF (1770 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the pathogens, drug resistance and risk factors of puerperal infection. Methods The clinical data of 124 parturients who delivered in our hospital from July 2020 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The infection rate, pathogenic bacteria and drug resistance were counted, and the risk factors of infection were analyzed. Results The infection rate was 7.26% in 9 parturients. The main infection sites were perineum incision (33.33%) and genital tract (22.22%). A total of 36 pathogens were detected, including 19 gram-negative bacteria (52.78%), 14 gram-positive bacteria (38.89%) and 3 fungi (8.33%). The resistance rate of gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) to rifampicin, vancomycin and meropenem was low. Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis) had low resistance rates to vancomycin and imipenem. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pregnancy complications, prenatal anemia, postpartum hemorrhage, labor process time ≥ 8 h, rupture time ≥ 12 h, and soft birth canal injury were independent risk factors of puerperal infection. Conclusion Gram-negative bacteria and positive bacteria were the main pathogens of puerperal infection, and the antibiotics with high sensitivity should be selected according to the drug resistance. There are many factors influencing puerperal infection, and corresponding preventive measures can be taken according to relevant risk factors.

Key words： puerperium infected pathogens drug resistance risk factors

Received: 28 September 2022

PACS:

R714.62

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	REN Jing
	LIANG Jiali
	XU Fengyi

Cite this article:

REN Jing,LIANG Jiali,XU Fengyi. Analysis of Pathogens, Drug Resistance and Risk Factors of Puerperal Infection[J]. HuNan ShiFan DaXue XueBao(YiXueBan), 2023, 20(5): 117-120.

URL:

http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/EN/ OR http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V20/I5/117

[1] 尤共平, 张晓蕾, 罗华琼. 某院产褥期感染病原菌及其危险因素[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2021, 31(13) : 2055-2059.
[2] 方静, 肖珊珊, 赵晓晓, 等. 产妇产褥期感染影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(6) : 1351-1354.
[3] Chee WJY, Chew SY, Than LTL .Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health[J]. Microb Cell Fact, 2020, 19(1):203.
[4] 吕英, 徐娟. 剖宫产产妇产褥期感染发生情况及影响因素研究[J]. 实用预防医学, 2019, 26(2) : 211-213.
[5] 郑顺杰, 胡益飞, 张琳, 等. 产妇产褥期感染的病原菌特点及耐药性分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2021, 31 (4) : 426-427+431.
[6] 樊友莉, 胡苑, 余芳, 等. 剖宫产产妇产褥期感染预测模型建立及验证[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2021, 31(23) : 3642-3646.
[7] Malmir M, Boroojerdi NA, Masoumi SZ, et al.Factors Affecting Postpartum Infection: A Systematic Review[J]. Infect Disord Drug Targets, 2022, 22(3) : e291121198367.
[8] 谢幸, 孔北华, 段涛. 妇产科(第9版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018 : 721-728.
[9] 叶应妩, 王毓三, 申子瑜. 全国临床检验操作规程(第3版)[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2006.
[10] 张琴芳, 董丽华, 沈叶琴. 不同分娩方式高危产妇产褥期感染的妊娠结局和危险因素[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(11) : 2609-2612.
[11] 肖云山, 林雪燕, 张雪芹. 产褥期重症感染的处理[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(10) : 1016-1020.
[12] 黄素静, 徐秋霞, 韦秋圆, 等. 高龄产妇产褥期感染影响因素及血清IL-6和PCT与TNF-α水平[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2021, 31(24) : 3803-3806.
[13] 石淑颖. 产妇产褥期感染的相关影响因素与临床预防控制[J]. 中国实用医药, 2019 (6) : 42-43.
[14] 陈娟. 不同分娩方式高危产妇产褥期感染与新生儿窒息的相关因素分析及其对策[J]. 抗感染药学, 2020, 17(4) : 557-559.
[15] 樊友莉, 胡苑, 余芳, 等. 剖宫产产妇产褥期感染预测模型建立及验证[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2021, 31(23) : 3642-3646.
[16] 李懿蔚, 马一玮, 张燕君, 等. 剖宫产术后产褥感染病原菌及其影响因素研究[J]. 华南预防医学, 2021, 47(11) : 1451-1453.