基于全科培训联合紧密医联体的基层医生房颤抗凝治疗模式的干预效果研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (2513 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的: 探讨全科培训联合紧密医联体的基层医生房颤抗凝治疗模式的干预效果,以期提升社区基层医生抗凝知识掌握水平。方法: 选取长沙观沙岭社区医院、望月湖社区医院、西湖社区医院3家医院共100名医务人员为干预对象,实施全科培训联合紧密医联体的基层医生房颤抗凝治疗模式干预方案。通过比较干预前后基层医生房颤抗凝知识掌握率、抗凝处方率和接受程度,探讨干预效果,并进一步分析干预满意度的相关影响因素。结果: 干预后,社区基层医生的房颤抗凝知识掌握率、抗凝药物处方率均较干预前有明显提升;共有70名（占70.0%）基层医生表示对干预方案的接受程度良好;卡方检验和二元Logistic回归分析结果显示年龄、最高学历、职称、工作年限和科室为全科培训联合紧密医联体的基层医生房颤抗凝治疗模式干预满意度的影响因素。结论: 实施全科培训联合紧密医联体的基层医生房颤抗凝治疗模式有利于提升社区基层医生对房颤抗凝知识掌握率和抗凝处方率,且接受度良好;同时,应考虑多种因素对该模式干预效果的影响。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	杨晓芳
	沙莎
	郑学斌

关键词 ：全科培训联合紧密医联体模式, 基层医生, 房颤抗凝

Abstract：Objective To explore the intervention effect of the combination of general practice training and close medical alliances on anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) among grassroots doctors, in order to improve their knowledge of anticoagulation in the community. Methods A total of 100 medical staff from three hospitals, including Changsha Guanshaling Community Hospital, Wangyuehu Community Hospital, and Xihu Community Hospital, were included as intervention subjects. The knowledge mastery rate, anticoagulation prescription rate, and training acceptance level of primary care doctors before and after the training were compared, and the influencing factors of the training satisfaction were analyzed. Results After intervention, the mastery rate of atrial fibrillation anticoagulation knowledge and the prescription rate of anticoagulants among community grassroots doctors were significantly improved compared to before intervention (P<0.05); 70 grassroots doctors (70.0%) expressed a good acceptance of the intervention plan; The results of chi square test and binary logistic regression analysis showed that age, highest education level, professional title, years of work experience, and department were the influencing factors of the intervention satisfaction of anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation among grassroots doctors trained in general practice and closely affiliated with medical consortia. Conclusion The implementation of the comprehensive training and close medical alliance model for primary care doctors in AF anticoagulation treatment is beneficial for improving the community's primary care doctors' mastery of atrial fibrillation anticoagulation knowledge and prescription rates, and has a good acceptance rate; Multiple factors affect the effectiveness of standardized anticoagulation training for atrial fibrillation

Key words： general practice training combined with a close medical consortium model primary care doctors atrial fibrillation anticoagulation

收稿日期: 2024-03-30

基金资助:湖南省卫生健康委科研项目 “全科培训联合紧密医联体模式下的基层房颤抗凝治疗体系的构建”（202216003050）

通讯作者: 沙莎,E-mail：1454597513@qq.com

引用本文:

杨晓芳, 沙莎, 郑学斌. 基于全科培训联合紧密医联体的基层医生房颤抗凝治疗模式的干预效果研究[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2024, 21(4): 156-160. YANG Xiaofang, SHA Sha, ZHENG Xuebin. The impact factors of standardized training and effectiveness of anticoagulation in primary care doctors with atrial fibrillation under the model of general practice training combined with close medical association. HuNan ShiFan DaXue XueBao(YiXueBan), 2024, 21(4): 156-160.

链接本文:

http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V21/I4/156

[1] 石雪连. 房室传导阻滞患者行双腔起搏器植入术后发生心房颤动的危险因素[J]. 中国民康医学, 2023, 35(23): 8-10.
[2] 魏梦珂, 孙亚梅, 陈雪, 等. 非瓣膜性心房颤动患者服用新型口服抗凝药发生消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中国医药, 2024, 19(01): 20-24.
[3] 洪农, 吴燕清, 蔡艺靖, 等. 心房颤动病人参与节律控制决策类型及其影响因素[J]. 循证护理, 2023, 9(24): 4471-4476.
[4] 潘忙忙, 顾智淳, 张弛, 等. 我院心房颤动抗凝药物治疗管理新模式的构建及取得的成效[J]. 上海医药, 2022, 43 (21): 5-8+41.
[5] 陈婕, 赵春艳, 王燕贤, 等. 基于标准化病人的社区护士心房颤动抗凝治疗相关护理能力培训实践[J]. 上海护理, 2022, 22(09): 54-57.
[6] CANNON CP, BHATT DI, OLDGREN J, et al.Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran after PCI in atrial fibrillation[J]. N Engl J Med.2017, 377(16): 1513-1524.
[7] 陆龙妹. 医联体模式下基层医院临床护理能力的实践与探索[J]. 中国社区医师, 2019, 35(34): 193-194.
[8] 徐佶佶, 陆志仁, 倪衡如, 等. 社区全科医生心房颤动诊疗能力调查及继续教育的提升效果[J]. 心血管康复医学杂志, 2022, 31(01): 37-42.
[9] 段园霞, 顾柳娜, 张磊, 等. 基层医务人员心房颤动相关知识掌握情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(07): 869-876.
[10] 刘露. 全科医生对心房颤动的认知现状调查[D]. 郑州: 河南大学, 2021.
[11] 郭艳, 罗娟, 廖雅琪, 等. 我国药师主导的华法林患者抗凝管理模式发展现状[J]. 中南药学, 2023, 21(12): 3361-3363.
[12] 史金平, 张琰, 唐亚娟, 等. 华法林抗凝质量影响因素的Meta分析与预测模型[J]. 中南药学, 2023, 21(06): 1684-1689.
[13] 汪蓉, 郑春美, 武桂林, 等. 基层医院房颤患者抗凝治疗现状调查研究[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2023, 14(13): 84-88.
[14] 郭海英, 曾辉. 社区心房颤动的综合管理[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2023, 15(05): 638-640.
[15] 吴相君, 李吉新, 吴红星, 等. 医共体管理模式对房颤患者华法林抗凝治疗效果的影响[J]. 全科医学临床与教育, 2021, 19(10): 929-931.
[16] 单书竹. 长沙郊区部分基层医生房颤抗凝规范化培训及效果影响因素分析[D]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2019.
[17] 伏星驰. 药师主导管理模式对非瓣膜性房颤住院患者华法林标准化抗凝治疗效果的影响[J]. 中国处方药, 2022, 20(11): 68-70.
[18] 陈婕, 赵春艳, 王燕贤, 等. 基于标准化病人的社区护士心房颤动抗凝治疗相关护理能力培训实践[J]. 上海护理, 2022, 22(09): 54-57.