两种PEEK界面螺钉和带袢钢板在关节镜下前交叉韧带重建的非劣效性研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献(21)
相关文章 (0)

全文: PDF (1891 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 目的：评估Delta Medical公司的聚醚醚酮（PEEK）界面螺钉和带袢钢板（EndoButton）与Smith & Nephew公司的PEEK界面螺钉和带袢钢板在关节镜下前交叉韧带重建患者中的临床疗效。方法：选取2017年11月―2019年7月在湖南省人民医院（湖南师范大学附属第一医院）接受关节镜下前交叉韧带（ACL）重建术的16例ACL损伤患者,随机分为两组（观察组和对照组）,每组8例。观察组术中采用德美公司的PEEK界面螺钉和带袢钢板;对照组采用施乐辉公司的PEEK界面螺钉和带袢钢板。术前和术后评估患者改良Lysholm膝关节评分、临床有效率、松弛度、活动度、MRI（核磁共振）检查结果、并发症发生率。结果：两组患者术后膝关节功能评分均有显著改善。在功能评分、临床有效率、松弛度和活动度方面没有观察到差异。没有观察到重大的术中或术后并发症,例如感染、血管或神经损伤。结论：两组的膝关节功能评分均在前交叉韧带重建术后得到改善。两组的功能评分和活动度差异不显著。与施乐辉公司相比,德美公司的PEEK界面螺钉和带袢钢板具有非劣效性。德美公司的PEEK界面螺钉和带袢钢板适用于关节镜下前交叉韧带重建。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李冠伯
	高鹏
	陈昕彤
	王靖

关键词 ： PEEK界面螺钉, 带袢钢板, 关节镜, 前交叉韧带重建

Abstract：Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Delta Medical's PEEK (polyether ether ketone) interface screws and EndoButton compared to Smith & Nephew's PEEK interface screws and EndoButton in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Sixteen patients with ACL injury who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction at Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University) between November 2017 and July 2019 were randomly assigned to two groups of 8 patients each. The observation group used Delta Medical's PEEK interface screws and EndoButton, while the control group used Smith & Nephew's PEEK interface screws and EndoButton. The patients were evaluated before and after surgery for Lysholm knee joint score, clinical efficacy rate, laxity, activity, MRI examination results, and incidence of complications. Results The knee joint function scores improved significantly in both groups after surgery. No differences were observed in functional scores, clinical efficacy rates, laxity, and activity. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications, such as infection, vascular or nerve injury. Conclusion The knee joint function scores improved after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in both groups. There was no significant difference in functional scores and activity between the two groups. Compared with Smith & Nephew, Delta Medical's PEEK interface screws and EndoButton demonstrated non-inferiority. Delta Medical's PEEK interface screws and EndoButton are suitable for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Key words： PEEK interface screw endobutton arthroscopy anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

收稿日期: 2023-03-25

中图分类号:

R687.2

基金资助:湖南省卫生健康委员会科研项目（202204073112,202204073117）; 湖南省教育厅科研项目（21B0041）

通讯作者: 王靖,E-mail：wangj0405@163.com

引用本文:

李冠伯, 高鹏, 陈昕彤, 王靖. 两种PEEK界面螺钉和带袢钢板在关节镜下前交叉韧带重建的非劣效性研究[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2023, 20(2): 74-78. LI Guanbo, GAO Peng, CHEN Xintong, WANG Jing. A non-inferiority study of two types of PEEK interface screws and EndoButton for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under arthroscopy. HuNan ShiFan DaXue XueBao(Yi Xue Ban), 2023, 20(2): 74-78.

链接本文:

http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 http://yxb.hunnu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V20/I2/74

[1] Beck NA, Lawrence JTR, Nordin JD, et al.ACL Tears in School-Aged Children and Adolescents Over 20 Years[J]. Pediatrics, 2017, 139(3): E20161877.
[2] Lopez CD, Gazgalis A, Peterson JR, et al. Machine Learning Can Accurately Predict Overnight Stay, Readmission,30-Day Complications Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction[J]. Arthroscopy, 2023, 39(3): 777-786. e5.
[3] Dai W, Leng X, Wang J, et al.Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2022, 50(12): 3425-3439.
[4] Papalia R, Vasta S, D'Adamio S, et al. Metallic or bioabsorbable interference screw for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction[J]. Br Med Bull, 2014, 109: 19-29.
[5] Hackl W, Fink C, Benedetto KP, et al.[Transplant fixation by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Metal vs. bioabsorbable polyglyconate interference screw. A prospective randomized study of 40 patients][J]. Unfallchirurg, 2000, 103(6): 468-474.
[6] Plominski J, Borcz K, Kwiatkowski K, et al.Fixation of patellar tendon bone graft in reconstruction of patellar ligaments. omparison of bioabsorbable and metal interference screws--results of treatment[J]. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2008, 10(1): 44-53.
[7] Shen C, Jiang SD, Jiang LS, et al.Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screw fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(5): 705-713.
[8] Ramsingh V, Prasad N, Lewis M.Pre-tibial reaction to biointerference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. The Knee, 2014, 21(1): 91-94.
[9] Pereira H, Correlo VM, Silva-Correia J, et al.Migration of "bioabsorbable" screws in ACL repair. How much do we know? A systematic review[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(4): 986-994.
[10] Krappel FA, Bauer E, Harland U.The migration of a BioScrew as a differential diagnosis of knee pain, locking after ACL reconstruction: a report of two cases[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2006, 126(9): 615-620.
[11] Shumborski S, Heath E, Salmon LJ, et al.A Randomized Controlled Trial of PEEK Versus Titanium Interference Screws for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 2-Year Follow-up[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(10): 2386-2393.
[12] Lindtner RA, Schmid R, Nydegger T, et al.Pedicle screw anchorage of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK screws under cyclic loading[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27(8): 1775-1784.
[13] Bartolo MK, Provaggi E, Athwal KK, et al.Strength of interference screw fixation of meniscus prosthesis matches native meniscus attachments[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2022, 30(7): 2259-2266.
[14] Verhagen EA, Clarsen B, Bahr R.A peek into the future of sports medicine: the digital revolution has entered our pitch[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2014, 48(9): 739-740.
[15] Hughes JD, Vaswani R, Gibbs CM, et al.Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Partial-Thickness Quadriceps Tendon Graft Secured With a Continuous-Loop Fixation Device[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2020, 9(5): e603-e609.
[16] Mae T, Kuroda S, Matsumoto N, et al.Migration of EndoButton After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(11): 1528-1535.
[17] Arnold MP, Calcei JG, Vogel N, et al.ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2021, 29(11): 3871-3876.
[18] Musahl V, Nazzal EM, Lucidi GA, et al.Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part 1: biology and biomechanics[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2022, 30(1): 20-33.
[19] Guglielmetti LGB, Salas VER, Jorge PB, et al.Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2021, 9(9): 23259671211028168.
[20] Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, et al.Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes for Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring-Tendon Autografts[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019, 47(14): 3531-3540.
[21] Harris MC, Venrick C, Hines AC, et al.Prospective Evaluation of Range of Motion in Acute ACL Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Autograft[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2019, 7(10): 2325967119875415.